Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a294dba10fc7f8bb

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Freepsbane

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Freepsbane}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Relevant IP edits Freepsbane is a user found to be a troll. Freepsbane has embarked on a vendetta agianst me since the consensus was against him during a previous edit war he started over another article back in December. He has persisted in edit warring on aeronautic articles in a aggressive manner. A check of the history of the page shows that Freepsbane and a few IP addresses (suspected to be his) have been almost continually involved in editwaring and ; a quick check of the accounts/addresses in question and their contributions shows that they have only edited over the topic of contention with a identical style. Downtrip (talk) 05:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)reply

this page is a simple copy edit of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Downtrip lacking a puppet. and not providing examples of violations of 3RR or meatpupperty along with the use of multiple letters, clearly a texbook case of a noncompliant request, used in an atempt at fishing.Freepsbane (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)reply

 Additional information needed After a quick look, I was not able to find the 3RR violations you are alleging. Please reformat the report with diffs showing the violation. I don't see how this content dispute qualifies as a serious pattern of vandalism either. Feel free to list this case once these two issues are addressed. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 09:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC).reply

no Declined - insufficient evidence of abuse here to take a case, sorry - Alison 22:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.