Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DemolitionMan

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DemolitionMan}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

DemolitionMan

• DemolitionMan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Trinityfactor (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Code letter: F
• Supporting evidence: The first edit by User:Trinityfactor makes reference to the Wikipedia personal attacks policy, which seems to make it likely that the user is a sock. He then proceeded to revert the article back twice to a previous version that was the subject of some contention. User:DemolitionMan is currently on a community placed Topic Ban on articles relating to the British Raj for disruption, see Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Placed by the Wikipedia_community, and seems to be a possible candidate as sockmaster,

Given that Trinityfactor started editing shortly after the start of DemolitionMan's ban, and with a similar POV, I'd like to request a checkuser to confirm whether this is DemolitionMan evading his topic ban. Leithp 11:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Unrelated. Thatcher 01:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.