Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DRV

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DRV}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

DRV

• Olborne (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• OrchWyn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Osomec (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Aviara (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Sumahoy (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)

• Code letter: D

A group of editors new to that process show up at deletion review to contest a number of deletions, that are on unrelated subjects but have the same closing admin. These deletions and that do not appear to match these editors' common subject areas, and their statements use similar-sounding pseudo-legalistic language, and some of them rarely or never edit user talk pages. Something feels fishy here.

Review pages (i.e. the "closed vote"):

Relevant sections: Category:Gates family, Category:American murderers, Category:Wealthy fictional characters

Confirmed. IP blocked. (IP had been softblocked previously.) --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 19:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.