Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AnonymousGoodFaith

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AnonymousGoodFaith}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

AnonymousGoodFaith

• AnonymousGoodFaith (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)

• Code letter: B

• Supporting evidence: AnonymousGoodFaith's first edit was a lengthy statement to an RFAR in which he indicated that he had interacted with WMC previously. This sort of behavior is in violation of the Arbcom ruling Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Privatemusings#Sockpuppetry which prohibits alternate accounts for the purposes of engaging in internal wiki debate. Requesting checkuser to identify and temporarily block the main account for violation of arbcom ruling and WP:SOCK. MBisanz ^talk 21:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Inconclusive. Nothing of interest in the CU evidence. RBI. Sam Korn ^(smoddy)
  • Clerk note: Account blocked indef. Tiptoety ^talk 00:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
    • Actually, I'm pretty sure I know who this is. I'm not convinced the name should be revealed as long as there is no serious attempt to disrupt the RFAR, and I think the better course of action when sock puppets come to accuse people is to ignore them unless they are willing to use their own name. The individual is invited to contact me if he would like to discuss the matter. Thatcher 16:14, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.