Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a29ccb027975376a

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2016 October 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Language desk
< October 6 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 8 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


October 7

[edit]

Third

[edit]

Does anyone know the reason third doesn't end in th?? Georgia guy (talk) 01:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply

Do you mean like first and second do? Here is the etymology of the word "third". --Jayron32 01:34, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
See also §5.2.3, §5.2.11.1.--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 09:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
third < Old English þridda; fourth < Old English fēorþa. —Stephen (talk) 10:13, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
It's a fair question because first and second are not derived from one and two (they literally mean more like 'leading' and 'following'), but third is derived from a cardinal number. —Tamfang (talk) 00:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC)reply
First and third from Old English, second from Latin. As in primary, secondary, tertiary. Go figure. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots05:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)reply
I haven't a reference for this, but I believe I've encountered an explanation that it is by dissimilation from the initial /θ/. A parallel case (height vs width, depth) is not susceptible to that explanation though, unless the feature '+continuant' on the initial segment is enough to trigger it (and then you'd need to explain why 'width' is exempt) --ColinFine (talk) 19:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)reply
In PIE there were no /θ/, and -dd- in the Old English word came from the intervocalic voicing of t in the suffix (compare Gothic þridja) and then the subsequent assimilation of d with j (this is why d became doubled, because j had to be compensated). In Middle English the word lost both the doubling and the final vowel (along with metathesis), hence the modern form.--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 00:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)reply