Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the requests for increase in protection level subpage of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
| |
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Almost every change over the past few months (aside from reverts and removing protection notice) has been disruptive, even before a semi-protection of one year ended. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:00, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent block evasion. An LTA has been hoping through different proxy addresses to engage in a slow edit war over the show's full title and add unsourced networks to the infobox. From checking the log, it seems that this page has been a target since as early as 2022, resulting in several temporary protections, the most recent of which lasted a year. Giovanni Potage (talk) 08:21, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 787 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent re-creation of standalone list against consensus, overwriting redirect. Danners430 tweaks made 08:53, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Not done User has not restored again. If they do, 
Consider the edit warring noticeboard. The Bushranger One ping only 01:28, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry crossed with COI/UPE. The exact details of how many people are involved are a bit opaque because of the sockpuppetry but it appears to be at least two, including the article subject and someone paid to edit on her behalf. They have been asked to clarify this, stop engaging in sockpuppetry, and make the necessary disclosures (see here, here, here and here) but haven't done so.
They have a good faith desire to see the article updated and to see some unnecessary person info removed from it (which has now been done); but they are not using sources, removing existing sources and relevant info without explanation, and generally being disruptive. Protecting the page might prompt them to engage in discussion and lead to a resolution of these good faith concerns. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:33, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:20, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temperory Semi-Protection for three days: constant pov pushing by ip vandals. Imsaneikigai (talk) 19:04, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent content dispute. ~2026-53271-60 (talk) 23:21, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:38, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary full protection, there's been talks about a vandal raid that will take place on the article shortly on various social media ~2026-53398-14 (talk) 23:40, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent editing tests from the same vandal. Disneymania 5 needs the same protection. Or just rangeblock the underlying IPs. Binksternet (talk) 23:46, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing PROMO sock activity. Hopefully semi will be adequate. ChompyTheGogoat [ Bleat | Munched ] 23:48, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Content dispute with one TA editor, with no indication they are a sockpuppet. No promo editing since mid-September; I would have protected then, but enough time has passed that it seems that is over for now. Curbon7 (talk) 00:41, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Was merged into the series article, but someone thinks the way to object to the merge is to put all the now-redundant content back. They shouldn't have to be reverted a third time. Maybe protecting will make them think to discuss it. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 00:01, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The TA editor has been warned and has not edited the page since then. If they continue re-adding the content to this page, they can be p-blocked from it then, but no action neede for now. Curbon7 (talk) 00:47, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Per the relevant AFD, this should have been salted. The original creator circumvented the AfC process and is likely UPE. Jdcomix (talk) 00:13, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. AriuCH (talk) 02:15, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. AriuCH (talk) 02:16, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: slow burning violation of WP:BLP by anon. I don't have all day to keep track of this article. The frequency may be relatively sparse, the pattern persists to the point that it warrants a semi-protection. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 02:26, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism for the past 2 weeks from multiple accounts and TAs. DonnieⓃⓄⓋⒶ 02:55, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Correction: not the past 2 weeks. However, this page has been vandalized by multiple accounts in a small period of time DonnieⓃⓄⓋⒶ 02:57, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:01, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Izno. Curbon7 (talk) 03:02, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Request previous protection be reinstated indefinitely due to ongoing disruption by SPAs in this topic area. ChompyTheGogoat [ Bleat | Munched ] 02:58, 5 October 2026 (UTC)