Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Windows Deployment Image Customization Kit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nom. There is a clear consensus to keep this draft. As such, I have closed the discussion as I see no point in keeping a discussion where there is a unanimous "keep". (non-admin closure) thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Reads like an advertisement. Also, sources are not reliable. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 15:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Source 1 has been updated with an article from a fairly reputable site (Microsoft Learn documentation) 1berr1sfueller (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: not really reasons to delete a draft since it doesn't seem to be exclusively promotional. Seems like a real thing, unlikely to be notable enough for an article, but it seems like at this point the normal WP:G13 process will handle this well enough. Skynxnex (talk) 16:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: If you didn't touch this draft, it would have been G13 deleted 2 weeks from now. Acceptable enough for draftspace, not overly promotional. Curbon7 (talk) 17:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Reliability of sources is not a reason to delete drafts, because it is a reason to decline drafts (so that the author can find better sources). This is not promotional enough to require G11, and drafts are not deleted for tone unless they need speedy deletion as G11. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.