Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/March 2026

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 15:36 30 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:26, 30 March 2026 (UTC).

---

Timeline of the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season

Nominator(s): Drdpw (talk), Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 01:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

The 2024 Atlantic hurricane season was hyperactive and cataclysmic. It started with a bang with Beryl, the earliest Category 4 or 5 Atlantic hurricane on record, which tore through the Caribbean and into the United States. Things went unusually quiet during the peak of the season, but that changed dramatically with the now-infamous Helene in late September and the exceptionally powerful Milton in early October. Both storms caused extensive destruction in the southeastern United States, with Helene additionally causing biblical flooding in the central Appalachian Mountains. The frenetic pace of activity during the season's final two months, coupled with the intensity of several of those storms, pushed 2024 to become an above-average season overall.

Drdpw and I are pleased to present to the community for consideration, the timeline of arguably one of the most significant hurricane seasons on record. HikingHurricane and Mltg404, having also been substantial contributors to this list, are invited to join us as co-nominators. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 01:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• [Tampico, Tamaulipas] is an MOS:SOB violation
• "Mexican [city of Veracruz]" -> "Mexican city of [Veracruz]"
• "central [Arkansas]" -> "[Central Arkansas]"

That's all I found, nothing to major just technical problems. (my FLC nom is missing is a source review if you would be so inclined) Olliefant (she/her) 16:29, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Y Corrections have been made. Drdpw (talk) 21:35, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant: In case you've missed this. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 16:11, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

• The full name of and link to the National Hurricane Center is hidden in a footnote, so it's not clear what NHC stands for if the the footnotes are ignored. It's also not clear immediately who "officially" defines the start and end dates of the season without looking at the references. Therefore, adding "according to the National Hurricane Center (NHC)" somewhere in the first paragraph would be useful. With this addition, the wikilink in the first footnote can be removed.
• Add a wikilink to Grenada for "Grenadian".
• Remove the comma in "(miles, or kilometers)".
• Adding Template:Use American English and Template:Use mdy dates at the top would be useful to ensure a consistent style in future edits, though this isn't a requirement.

Will review the list itself soon. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:10, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Is there a reason why the absorptions of Tropical Depression Beryl and Subtropical Storm Debby into weather fronts are in the July 9 and August 9 sections even though the events happened "two days later" (July 11 and August 11, respectively)?
• Replace all instances of "Cabo Verde islands" with "Cape Verde Islands" (common name and consistency with Cape Verde).

That's all from me. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 16:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Y Modifications have been made. Drdpw (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Looks good; still missing the "Cabo Verde islands" → "Cape Verde Islands" changes though. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Y All now read "Cape Verde" Drdpw (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Support. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 07:37, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/28/26)

Lead

• I'm going to be honest: I don't like the first paragraph. The first sentence is very awkward. This sentence – "The season officially began on June 1, and officially ended on November 30. These dates, adopted by convention, historically describe the period in each year when most subtropical or tropical cyclogenesis occurs in the Atlantic Ocean." – could be merged. Perhaps "The season officially began on June 1 and ended on November 30. This is historically the period during which most subtropical or tropical cyclogenesis occurs over the Atlantic Ocean." or something similar? The last sentence is good.
• The second paragraph is good and succinctly summarizes the storm season.

Timeline

• "A tropical depression forms from a tropical wave about 65 mi (100 km) northeast of Veracruz, Veracruz." The redundant Veracruzes look weird.
• "...about 305 mi (490 km) southeast of Punta Palenque Lighthouse, Dominican Republic" --> as Punta Palenque Lighthouse is not a city, I would rephrase as "Punta Palenque Lighthouse, in the Dominican Republic."
• "The extratropical low formerly Beryl" --> This reads very awkwardly.
• "The extratropical low formerly Debby" --> Ditto.
• Under September 24, you don't need to wikilink Cuba.
• Under September 26, you don't need to wikilink Tampa, Florida (it has already been previously wikilinked).
• Under September 27, you should probably wikilink Leeward Islands.

@Dylan620: The timeline is very good with only the few issues I listed above. The first paragraph needs some work. Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Bgsu98, apologies for taking so long to get to these. I like your suggestion for the first paragraph and have applied it, as well as condensing the first sentence. All points regarding the timeline have been addressed. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:03, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 15:36, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 15:36 30 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:26, 30 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of nesomyids

Nominator(s): PresN 02:59, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey y'all, mammal list #71 in our perpetual series and rodent list #16: Nesomyidae. We continue through the Myomorpha suborder, aka "things shaped like mice", with a mid-size family of African rodents. It unfortunately doesn't have a handy common name for the whole group, instead including 67 Malagasy rodents, climbing mice, African rock mice, pouched rats, and tufted-tailed rats, all of which look like... well, mice, just slightly different enough to not be lumped in with the regular mouse family. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 02:59, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

• Support - try as I might I couldn't find anything to pick up on. BTW Bastard big-footed mouse might be the best animal name ever :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

  I hoped that it was named because someone got bit by one back in 1898, but according to the original publication, it's named "in order to recall both its most remarkable external characteristics and the name of the traveler to whom we owe this interesting species.", so I guess someone in Madagascar was named e.g. "John Bastard". --PresN 16:22, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

  Maybe a relative of this fella.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:42, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (3/7/26)

• The only suggestion I can make is that when listing the diets on the table, you might consider pluralizing "grain" (to "grains"), since the other foods are plural, and both "grain" and "grains" are acceptable.

• User:PresN: Since that is only a suggestion, I will add my support now. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Octave (source)

• References 7 and 10, and 19 and 23 are duplicated
• Other than that, no concerns with reliability or formatting, and spotchecks turned up no issues. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 17:43, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

  @UpTheOctave!: Fixed, thanks for reviewing! --PresN 18:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

  Passing source review. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 18:05, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Dank

• Let's see if I can dust off my brain and review this. - Dank (push to talk) 22:43, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
• Generally crisp and concise writing, which is harder to achieve than one might think.
• I've seen different opinions on whether "extant" should be linked, at least at first occurrence, to Extant taxon ... I think it should, because the implied definition there is more slippery than the dictionary definition. Up to you.
• Image licenses are fine. - Dank (push to talk) 23:19, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

  @Dank: Added the link, thanks for reviewing! --PresN 01:18, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• Checking the FLC criteria:
• 1. Nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. I'm comfortable relying on the source review.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
• 6. It is stable.
• Support - Dank (push to talk) 03:47, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

IAR promotion, as I'm the only promoter for now. --PresN 15:36, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 15:36 30 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:25, 30 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1965

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Here's the fourth Hot 100 number ones list. The British Invasion continued this year, and unusually one British act had two US number ones, neither of which was even released as a single in their own home country. Weird! As ever, feedback will be most gratefully received and acted upon as soon as humanly possible :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Image review

Here will be an image review from me! Arconning (talk) 12:49, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• File:1966 The Supremes.JPG - Public Domain, source link is dead; either must be replaced with an archived link, image is replaced entirely, or removed.
• File:Aankomst van de Rolling Stones op Schiphol, Bestanddeelnr 916-7420.jpg - CC0
• File:The-Temptations (1964 publicity photo by Kriegsmann).jpg - Public Domain, can't seem to find the image within the source link
• File:Hermans Hermits 1965.jpg - Public Domain
• Almost all of the alt-text for the images is present with the exception of the first image, this should be fixed for accessibility.
• All images are relevant to the article and have proper captioning.
  • @Arconning: - I swapped the two problematic images for other ones -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:03, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

  Pass Arconning (talk) 13:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/22/26)

• "Capitol Records, the label which held the rights to their singles in the United States, initially declined to release them, however, deeming them unsuitable for the U.S. market." --> There's nothing wrong with this sentence, but boy, does Capitol Records sure look stupid in retrospect! 😂
• I have no issues with the prose, the formatting of the tables, or the photo captions. Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:55, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars

• Criteria 3c is an issue here. Does this violate the content-forking guideline? It certainly duplicates material from List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles from 1958 to 1969 or vice versa. Those decade lists as is should go to eliminate the redundancy. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 05:43, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
  • @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: - I didn't even realise that list existed. Nobody mentioned it at any of my previous nominations....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:26, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
    • Chris, this is an old memory so it may not be reliable, but I remember being surprised at one point that a list of historic sites at FLC was deemed to pass criterion 3c, even though it was a sublist of an existing list that had only about twice as many sites, in theory because it provided more details than the longer list (but it didn't provide a lot more details). In this case, the "decade" list (12 years in a decade?) mentioned here has exactly one reference. Just my two cents, but I don't think your list has a 3c problem ... but it could well be that the 12-year list would have a 3c problem if it were ever nominated as a featured list. - Dank (push to talk) 04:41, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Dank

• Good to be back.
• The heading for the third column in the table is broken. I fixed one hiccup/hiccough with the sorting.
• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• Checking the FLC criteria:
• 1. Nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review).
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
• 6. It is stable.
• Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 15:15, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

• Support I didn't see any issues with the prose or accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. I agree that the decade list is redundant to your side-ranging precedent of these by-year FLs, and should be removed or else changed to discuss longer-ranging trends. --PresN 15:36, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 15:36 30 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:25, 30 March 2026 (UTC).

---

Australian Convict Sites

Nominator(s): MCE89 (talk) 06:16, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

This is a list of the eleven sites included in the Australian Convict Sites World Heritage Site. This is my first time at FLC and a bit of a different topic from what I usually write about, but I hope this meets the FL criteria and am very grateful to anyone who takes the time to review! MCE89 (talk) 06:16, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

Glad to see more serial WHS lists coming in. I'll leave my own suggestions as well as some drawn from comparison with the recently featured The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier.

• Refs 1, 2, 5 should have "UNESCO World Heritage Centre" as the publisher (not "UNESCO"). Then, Ref 5's title should be just "Australian Convict Sites".
  • Done MCE89 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
• Following the structure of the existing WHS FLs, the website for Ref 1 ("World Heritage List") is unnecessary. This reference is also missing an access date.
  • Done MCE89 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
• Ref 3 is missing the date parameter (31 July 2010).
  • Done MCE89 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
• All web refs would benefit from being archived though this isn't a requirement.
  • I've been having no luck with IA bot lately, but will have a go at getting it to archive these. Otherwise I'll add them manually when I get a chance. MCE89 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
• Include core and buffer zone areas in the infobox (1,502.51 ha and 3,887.63 ha, respectively). You may use Template:Convert to also show the areas in square miles (per MOS:CONVERSIONS: Generally, conversions to and from metric units and US or imperial units should be provided).
  • Done
• Rename the "List" heading to "Sites".
  • Done
• Consider adding a "UNESCO ID / Property area" column to the table similarly to The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier (the relevant info can be found here).
  • Oh good call, done!
• "1600 kilometres" → "1,600 kilometres"; here and in other cases, kilometres should also be shown in miles (MOS:CONVERSIONS).
  • I generally prefer not to group digits in four-digit numbers, which is allowed by MOS:DIGITS (Numbers with exactly four digits left of the decimal point may optionally be grouped (either 1,250 or 1250), consistently within any given article.)

• In that case, leaving the comma out is fine by me. The conversions of kilometres to miles are missing in the description of the Old Great North Road though.
  • Added those conversions

• "An administrative precinct" → "The administrative precinct"
  • Done
• Wikilink "gaols".
  • Done
• "remains of a lumberyard and quarry" → "remains of a lumberyard and a quarry"
  • Done
• "male convicts who re-offended, who were subjected to" – I'm not a fan of the two "who"s close to each other. Maybe change to "male convicts who re-offended and were subjected to" or something similar.
  • Tweaked slightly differently
• "Overcrowding and disease let to high mortality rates;" → "Overcrowding and disease led to high mortality rates:" (fix typo & replace semicolon with colon).
  • Fixed

• The semicolon → colon change is still not done.
  • Oops, could have sworn I'd changed that! Now done

• Remove wikilink at "quarries" (not linked elsewhere and not an uncommon term IMO).
  • Done
• "including a barracks, hospital, and dry dock" → "including barracks, a hospital, and a dry dock"
  • Done
• "nineteenth century" & "twentieth century" should probably be changed to "19th century" & "20th century" in accordance with using numerals rather than words elsewhere.
  • Done
• "1000 prisoners" → "1,000 prisoners"
  • Per above
• Since the Tasmanian sites are shown on a separate map and their locations aren't clear on the first map, they can be removed from the first one, with the caption extended with "(Tasmanian sites excluded)" and the alt text amended accordingly.
  • Good call, done
• "with one site located to the north of Tasmania" (alt text of the Tasmanian sites map) should instead say "with one site located in northern Tasmania".
  • Fixed
• I believe "Two-story" (alt text of Old Government House) should be "Two-storey" in Australian English.
  • Fixed
• Except for the minor issues listed above, alt text seems fine. The table caption and row/col scopes are present, so no accessibility issues. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:24, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks so much for the review @Shwabb1! Replied to your comments above. MCE89 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Looks good. There are still a few small issues left (replied above), and also I'd like to suggest making the location column sortable; once these are resolved, I'll support. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 12:31, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Both done, and changed the column to be sortable as suggested. MCE89 (talk) 12:46, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Support on prose and accessibility. I also have a nomination open at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Monuments of national significance in Zhytomyr Oblast/archive1 if you don't mind taking a look. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 13:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you! Happy to review your nomination, feel free to give me a ping if I haven't gotten to it in the next few days. MCE89 (talk) 13:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Link World Heritage and transportation in the body as well as the lead
  • Done
• "The island's barracks were designs to house 328 men" - presumably meant to say "designed".....?
  • Oops, fixed
• That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
  • @ChrisTheDude: Thanks so much for the review! Both done. MCE89 (talk) 12:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (3/7/26)

Lead

• Recommend editing the very first sentence to begin with "The Australian Convict Sites are a World Heritage Site..."
  • Done
• You use both "11" and "eleven" in the same paragraph. You need to pick one (personally, I like "eleven".)
  • Agreed and done
• Wikipedia prefers that the lead contain no citations, as any information in the lead should theoretically be included later in the article. Therefore, what are currently sources no. 1, 2, and 3 should be relocated elsewhere, assuming this information is provided elsewhere. If it is not, it should be.
  • Done
• Wouldn't it be "on Tasmania" since Tasmania is an island?
  • I'm not too sure why, but we definitely say "in Tasmania", possibly because it's treated as a state/jurisdiction and not just as an island — I don't think I've heard "on Tasmania" used before.

History

• The history of these sites should be included here.
  • I've added a paragraph of background on the convict system and penal sites in Australia in general (which also allowed me to remove the citations in the lead). Let me know what you think
    • Only one suggestion: "Convicts were sent to Australia for a range of offences, including for committing petty crimes and for supporting particular political causes."

Kingston and Arthurs

• Recommend wikilinking crankmill.
  • Replaced with "hand-cranked corn mill" as we don't really have a good article to link to

Hyde Park

• "Eventually, however, the barracks began to be used as a trial depot..." --> Recommend rewording as "However, the barracks were eventually used as a trial depot..."
  • Done

Brickendon and Woolmers

• "About 85% of convicts in Australia spent part of their sentence employed through this system."
  • Done

Freemantle Prison

• I don't think the separate system needs to be in quotation marks.
  • Removed

User:MCE89: Let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:25, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Bgsu98! Replied to your comments above. MCE89 (talk) 12:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

User:MCE89: Only one additional suggestion above with regards to your new paragraph. Everything else is excellent. I will go ahead and support now. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:59, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Done as well :) MCE89 (talk) 13:02, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

User:MCE89: When you have a minute, check out the improvements I’ve made to Figure skating at the 2002 Winter Olympics – Pair skating. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Promise it's on my list! Will take a look later tonight. MCE89 (talk) 13:10, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 15:36, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:57 27 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of number-one singles on Tio i Topp

Nominator(s): VirreFriberg (talk) 23:43, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it is a list representing the number-ones of the first official national top-ten record chart in Sweden. VirreFriberg (talk) 23:43, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Sveriges Radio's first single chart" => "Sveriges Radio's first singles chart"
• "was immensively popular with Sweden's youth" - I think you mean "immensely". "Immensively" is not a real word
• "where only one the jury" => "where only one jury"
• "most commercially successful artist" => "most successful act"
• "had the most number-ones " => "had the most number ones "
• "the Swedish act with the most number-ones" => "the Swedish act with the most number ones"
• "spent the longest time in the top-ten" => "spent the longest time in the top ten"
• Neither of the entries in the key should have a full stop, as they are not sentences
• Pat Boone image caption needs a full stop
• The key shows daggers for both items. Firstly, the symbols should be different, as having the same symbol for both does not help people who can't see the colours. And secondly, you have to actually use the symbols in the tables along with the colours.
• "merseybeat British invasion" is a SEAOFBLUE. Although, as "British invasion" very specifically refers to British acts "invading" the United States, I don't feel it is appropriate to use here anyway.
• "were listed as joint number-ones" => "were listed as joint number ones"
• "The voting that was to take place on 24 December 1966 was cancelled as it was Christmas Day" - 24 December is not Christmas Day. Maybe just say "as it was a holiday"
• "The Who had their only number one-song" => "The Who had their only number-one song"
• "The Bee Gees had their first number one single" => "The Bee Gees had their first number-one single"
• "Elvis Presley had his last number one-single" => "Elvis Presley had his last number-one single"
• Chris Andrews caption needs a full stop
• "George Harrison had his only number one song" => "George Harrison had his only number-one song"
• Lalla Hanson caption needs a full stop
• "The New Seekers had two number one songs" => "The New Seekers had two number-one songs"
• Michael Jackson caption needs a full stop
• "Björn Skifs managed two number-ones" => "Björn Skifs managed two number ones"
• "Harpo had a number one song " => "Harpo had a number-one song "
• That was a really interesting read. Nice to see a list of number ones here from a country other than the United States -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:49, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

  Hi, @ChrisTheDude! Revised the article based on your points. Seperated the key with daggers (†) and double-daggers (‡) and added them to their respective places in the article! VirreFriberg (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Date becomes !scope=col | Date.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 14 October becomes !scope=row | 14 October (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Images are missing alt-text.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• I would suggest that you use the {{Legend}} template instead of the table that you have right now.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:42, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  Hi @MPGuy2824! I revised the article based on your suggestions, with a handful of inquires of my own.

  • Changed the tables based on these notes to the best of my abilities. However, I'm not very CSS-savvy so I might require assistance.
  • Added alt captions to the images for accessability purposes.
  • The key (legend) that is used on the article is done so to facilitate the usage of two symbols; (†) and double dagger (‡). Unsure of how they would be incorporated into {{Legend}} as the instructions provides no instructions.

  VirreFriberg (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  • I've replaced the key table with legend templates.
  • However, I'm not very CSS-savvy This is mostly wikitable code. Don't worry, it isn't too tough.
  • You've missed adding the scope=col for the first col of the tables.
  • In the alt-texts there is no need of wikilinking things.
  • Also, I'm not a fan of "re" on its own. You can ape what Chris has done in List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1959. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:21, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

    Hi again, @MPGuy2824. Thank you for adding the legend key to the article!

    • Added the missing !scope=col
    • Removed the Wiki links from the alt-image captions
    • Added the suggestion for the "re"'s.

    Thanks! VirreFriberg (talk) 13:37, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support on accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:55, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Thebiguglyalien

• A brief description of progg, even just a couple words, would help so I don't have to click on the link to understand what the lead is saying.
• The lead should probably mention Stockholm's role as a jury city.
• Do we know why Europatoppen was prioritized over Tio i Topp?
• Some of the notes are important enough that there needs to be some sort of indicator. Readers who only see the entry in the table might be misled if they don't see "often considered disqualified from the Tio i Topp canon" much lower.
• There are no annotations 1969–1974. That's fine if nothing happened, but at the very least it should describe how it ended.
• Why are the images at the end of the previous section instead of the start of the relevant section?

VirreFriberg, pretty good overall, just a few minor thoughts. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Thebiguglyalien! Revised the article based on your suggestions:

• added short description about progg (political musical)
• added mention of Stockholm as a permanent jury city until 1967
• incorporated some of the more important notes into the tables in the form of notes
• added the images to their correct positions in the article.

I have no idea as to why Europatoppen was prioritized over Tio i Topp, as the Hallberg/Henningsson book doesn't give any answers. According to the article on the Swedish Wikipedia (Europatoppen), Europatoppen was arranged by the European Broadcasting Union and was a collaboration between six countries which is probably why it took a higher priority. This is only speculation though, and without a reliable source shouldn't be added

I added no notes between 1969 and 1974 as (to my knowledge) there wasn't a single weekly broadcast cancelled during those five years.

Thanks for your time! VirreFriberg (talk) 11:23, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Support. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:39, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

No concerns found in review; source review passed; promoting. --PresN 12:57, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:56 27 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:26, 27 March 2026 (UTC).

---

Slovenian Figure Skating Championships

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:00, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

The Soviet Figure Skating Championships was just promoted today, so here is another. This one is quick and easy, as Slovenia has only existed as a separate country since the breakup of Yugoslavia. As always, the tables are properly formatted, the results have been personally verified, and the sources should be properly formatted. I look forward to your constructive feedback, and thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:00, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Early championships were organized by Slovenia's four skating clubs" - if only "early" championships were organised by these clubs, who organises them now and when did it change?
• Stanko Bloudek links to the article on a guy who died in 1959. Presumably the club is named after him, but is the link not a bit EGG.....?
• That's all I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Okay, I did some research and it looks like the Slovene Skating Union was founded in 1991 as a federation of the four skating clubs, so those two entities – the Slovene Skating Union and the four skating clubs – are the same thing. I have rewritten the first paragraph to incorporate this new information, but I'm not sure how it reads. Can you take a look and let me know what you think? Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:20, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:51, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Image review

Here will be an image review from me! Arconning (talk) 12:54, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• File:Slovene Skating Union logo.png - Fair use
• File:2008 TEB Men Urbas01.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, source link is dead so it must be replaced with an archived one.
• File:Teodora Postic at 2009 Nebelhorn Trophy.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, source link is dead so it must be replaced with an archived one.
• File:2008 TEB Men Urbas02.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, source link is dead so it must be replaced with an archived one.
• File:Grm - 2016 Euro - 2.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, source link is dead so it must be replaced with an archived one.
• All images are relevant to the article with proper alt-texts for accessibility and captioning.
  • Just these comments and I think we'd be good to go!

• @Arconning: Thank you for letting me know; I have added archive links for all four photos. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:05, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Pass Arconning (talk) 13:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

I have only a few minor concerns. Great work as usual.

• Slovene uses sentence case for titles (Slovene: Prvenstvo Slovenije v umetnostnem drsanju)
• Not sure if Labod Bled should be translated ("Swan Bled"). Do any of the sources do that?
• Ref 1 is missing the language parameter.

Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:27, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1: I have addressed all of these. As to the name of organization (Zveza Drsalnih Športov Slovenije), this website shows the name in capital case at the top, but sentence case at the bottom. Which would you recommend? Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:16, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

The website only uses the title case at the top of that page and in the copyright notice (probably a stylistic choice) but sentence case elsewhere. Searching the phrase brings up numerous instances of sentence case and seemingly none using title case. So, Zveza drsalnih športov Slovenije should be correct.

Support. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 07:49, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Dank

• Ref 26 is throwing an error.
• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• Checking the FLC criteria:
• 1. Nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements.
• 6. It is stable.
• Support, provisional on a clean source review ... I'll come back and take another look at that time. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 06:33, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

  That error was caused by source no. 7 not copying properly. I’ve fixed it; thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:06, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

ChrisTheDude, Shwabb1, and Dank: I have just received a "the clock is ticking" warning on my FA nomination (Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Figure skating at the 2002 Winter Olympics – Pair skating/archive1). If you might have the time to offer a review there, I would sincerely appreciate it, and would certainly be happy to return the favor if you have anything pending in need of a review. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:13, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

FLC is as much as I can handle right now. Best of luck. - Dank (push to talk) 20:18, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

I will take a look when I am back from holiday and on my laptop again. Trying to do a FAC review on my phone would be next to impossible.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:11, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

I've been busy recently, though I should have more time soon so I may take a look. However, I'm not sure if I can leave a full review since I've never reviewed an FAC. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:57, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 12:56, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:56 27 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:26, 27 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of Inkigayo Chart winners (2022)

Nominator(s): -- EN-Jungwon 10:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Re-nominating after addressing comments from the previous nomination. Thank you for your time. -- EN-Jungwon 10:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Image review

Here'll be an image review from me! Arconning (talk) 15:17, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• File:00108 (여자)아이들 (G)I-DLE Gaon Awards (tweaked) (2).jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:아이브 - 뮤직뱅크 출근길 직캠 IVE MusicBank Fancam 220624.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:"예쁨가득" 보아, 멀리서도 빛나는 물광 피부 BOA 보아 (디패짤) 02.png - CC BY 3.0
• File:Taeyeon for Elle Taiwan on 06042023 (1).png - CC BY 3.0
• File:Hyoyeon at Wendy's Youngstreet in August 2022 01.png - CC BY 3.0
• File:슬기 (SEULGI) Marie Claire Pop Quiz (derived).jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Wendy at Incheon Airport on September 9, 2019.jpg - CC BY 4.0, please provide an archived version of the source link.
• File:카리나(KARINA) SBS Radio (derived).jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Winter at SBS Radio on 21.10.13.jpg - CC BY 3.0, a YouTube CC BY 3.0 template for clarification would help.
• File:220701 Nayeon(나연) of Twice MusicBank Fancam.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:220804 뉴진스(NewJeans), 비주얼 파티.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • All images have alt-text for accessibility, all are relevant to the article, and have proper captions.
    • Just one comment to address!

@Arconning, I have added an archive link to the file on Commons and also added the relevant YouTube CC BY template to the other image. Thank you for the review! -- EN-Jungwon 16:05, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• @Arconning pinging. -- EN-Jungwon 15:10, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Pass Arconning (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• There are several uses of "number one single" or "number one song". When used as an adjective (as it is here) "number-one" has a hyphen
• Triple Crown sometimes has capital letters and sometimes doesn't
• Think that's all I got - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:29, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude, thanks for the review! Both comments have been addressed. -- EN-Jungwon 04:25, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

You've slightly misunderstood my first point. When used as an adjective, "number-one" has a hyphen, e.g. "Blackpink had the number-one song". When it is used as a noun, as in "Blackpink reached number one", it doesn't. I fixed that for you and am now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:34, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Cavan121012

• Just from a quick look I think Tomorrow X Together member Choi Yeon-jun who hosted the show is the same person as Yeonjun? If so I'd wikilink him in the first paragraph. Sungchan can be linked as well.
• I'd wikilink the group NewJeans in the second paragraph

Couldn't find anything else, nice work. Cavan121012 (talk) 15:03, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

@Cavan121012, thanks for the review. I have wikilinked the three pages you mentioned. -- EN-Jungwon 09:17, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Support Cavan121012 (talk) 09:44, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Dank

• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• "advanced viewer votes": None of my usual dictionaries say that "advanced" can mean "in advance". Try "viewer votes before the show" or "viewer votes in advance of the show".
• "They also earned a triple crown for the succeeding single "Love Dive", and along with "After Like", they were the artist with the most weeks at number-one in 2022.": They also earned a triple crown for the succeeding single "Love Dive". They were the artist with the most weeks at number-one in 2022, for this song and "After Like".
• Your table is sorting (G)I-dle before Big Bang ... I don't really have an opinion because I don't know how "(G)I-dle" is pronounced, but you might want to sort it with the G's.

• Checking the FLC criteria:
• 1. Nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
• 6. It is stable.
• Close enough for a support, provisional on a clean source review ... I'll come back and take another look at that time. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 02:39, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

@Dank, thank you for the review. The suggestion about "advanced viewer votes" and table sorting has been resolved. For the other suggestion I have rephrased it like this: They also earned a triple crown for the succeeding single "[[Love Dive (song)|Love Dive]]". The two singles along with "[[After Like (song)|After Like]]", ranked number one for a total of 7 weeks making them the artist with the most weeks at number-one in 2022. Please let me know if this needs any improvement. Thanks! -- EN-Jungwon 15:29, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Ah, I missed that, thanks for fixing it. - Dank (push to talk) 16:09, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 12:56, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:56 27 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:26, 27 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of How I Met Your Mother episodes

Nominator(s): Olliefant (she/her) 08:11, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I've decided to abandon my dream of having a dedicated "Electoral history" section on the FL page (and I can't be bothered to write about Mike Pence), so I'll do this. This is part of a bigger project involving HIMYM articles Olliefant (she/her) 08:11, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "How I Met Your Mother is an American sitcom which ran for nine seasons on CBS" - I know you mention the dates of the individual seasons later on but I feel like it wouldn't hurt to give the overall timespan here Done
• "until the season eight finale, "Something New", where she is portrayed by Cristin Milioti" => "until the season eight finale, "Something New", in which she is portrayed by Cristin Milioti" Done
• "with the season one finale releasing on May 15, 2006" - I don't think "releasing" is right here. Something like "being broadcast" would work Done
• "Season two released from September 18, through May 14, 200" - again, I think "released" is not right. "Was broadcast" would work Done
• "Season seven ran from September 19 through May 14, 2012" - September 19, 2011, presumably, unless it somehow aired backwards through time
  • 2011 was established as the year in the prior sentence, all of the ranges are written like that.
    • Good point
• That's it, I think -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:24, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: done most, responded to one Olliefant (she/her) 15:35, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from TheDoctorWho

The following comments are made off of this version of the list:

• The list needs a short description Done
• The image needs alt text Done
• The image should not used a fixed px size Done
• CBS links to CBS Sports Done
• The fact that the series ran for nine seasons is in the first sentence of both the first and second paragraphs Done
• "During the eighth season, Segal stated that he planned to depart the series when his contract expired at the end of the season. As a result, the fate of the series was unknown." it appears, at least according to the character list, that Segal did not leave in season 9. While this is good information to have here, a sentence on why he ultimately stayed (or at least stating that he did, if the why isn't known) would be good Done
• "On May 19, a fifth season, which was mandated by a syndication deal signed with Lifetime,[8] was ordered;[9] it ran from September 21, through May 24, 2010. In January 2010, the series was given an early renewal.[10]" not a full source check, but Lifetime isn't mentioned in any of the three sources attached to that sentence Done
• 2012–2013 television season should likely like to 2012–13 United States network television schedule rather than 2012 in American television, as the latter only covers one year Done
• The second paragraph of the lead as a whole feels very WP:PROSELINEy, likely because you have several announcement/renewal date on top of the other dates. With nine seasons, it feels a bit excessive to list every premiere and finale date. While this works in episodes lists with shorter seasons (ex: List of Torchwood episodes, List of Line of Duty episodes), I've started trimming it in longer lists (ex: List of Station 19 episodes, List of Private Practice episodes, List of My Name Is Earl episodes), both of which had fewer seasons than this. If deciding to cut it though, the lead may benefit from other information as to not be too short (see the aforementioned articles for reference ideas)
  • I don't think its a big enough problem to warrent cutting it
• I feel a brief mention of the existence of How I Met Your Father (and maybe the failed How I Met Your Dad at the end of the lead may be useful Done
• Any reason why Season 8 episodes 11 and 12 are using <hr /> to separate the episodes rather than individual parameters similar to the other two two-part episodes? Done
• Season 9 is missing a table caption Done
• I feel the ratings graphs may be both more visually pleasing and useful to readers if they were were split evenly (seasons 1–3, 4–6, and 7–9) rather than leaving 9 out there on an island all by itself Done
• May be worth appending |20em to the end of the notelist template to kill some of that whitespace Done
• Citation 2 is missing an author Done
• The official website is 404, but looks like there's plenty of archives to pick from Done

Think that's it from me. TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:28, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

• @TheDoctorWho: done all Olliefant (she/her) 07:58, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho: Olliefant (she/her) 07:30, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Support, I guess, noting that I'm still not the biggest fan of the second paragraph for reasons noted above. TheDoctorWho (talk) 17:48, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Cavan121012

• In the second paragraph, is there a reason why seasons one and seven are wikilinked but not the others? I see the eighth and ninth seasons are linked in the opening paragraph but the others aren't
• In the ratings section, the subheadings are wrong (Season 5–8 and Season 9 should be Season 4–6 and Season 7–9)

Didn't see much else, think the other reviewers covered a lot. Ping when done. Cavan121012 (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

@Cavan121012: done Olliefant (she/her) 20:15, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Support Cavan121012 (talk) 09:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 12:56, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:56 27 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:25, 27 March 2026 (UTC).

---

Jon Hamm filmography

Nominator(s): Olliefant (she/her) 15:35, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

For my next Vice President I'm going with Jon Hamm, he's had an extensive body of work and I plan to make this part of a Featured Topic. Olliefant (she/her) 15:35, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Jon Hamm was a Vice President? Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:05, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "as a contest on the dating show" - contestant, surely?
• "His first appearance was in 1996 as a contest on the dating show The Big Date, his first acting role was in 1997 as an extra on Ally McBeal." - you either need to change the comma to a semi-colon or make the second part a separate sentence
• "his breakthrough role role" - spot the stray word ;-)
• "in the 2007 AMC drama series Mad Men." - I am not hugely familiar with Mad Men but I don't believe it took place solely in 2007
• "he told The Hollywood Reporter, "it very conscious decision" - I am guessing he didn't really word it like that
• "citing Saturday Night Live and 30 Rock as examples,[4] he received three Emmy nominations for the latter" - comma to semi colon or new sentence
• "2000 Clint Eastwood film Space Cowboys where he played" => "2000 Clint Eastwood film Space Cowboys, in which he played"
• "various voice roles including, SpongeBob SquarePants" - no need for that comma
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:12, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: done all Olliefant (she/her) 15:18, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/22/26)

Lead

• You need an en-dash (–) between 2007 and 2015. Done
• "...winning his final nomination in 2015." --> That sounds kind of awkward; perhaps something along the lines of "finally winning in 2015"? Done
• "In 2024, he told The Hollywood Reporter, "it was a very conscious decision to lean into the comedic stuff" --> I'm not positive about this, but shouldn't the "it" be capitalized, assuming it was the beginning word in Hamm's statement?
  • It wasn't, the full quote is "That’s why, for me, it was a..."
• The tables all appear to be properly formatted!

@Olliefant: Let me know when you've had a chance to examine my (very few) comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:05, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: done all Olliefant (she/her) 20:42, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:50, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Dank

• Very impressed with the prose, but I see a thing or two to comment on in the tables.
• "Denotes works that have not yet been released": I'm not objecting, you should do whatever is standard with these lists, but it seems strange to say this when all works have been released.
• "Mayor Jerry Generazzo" should sort before "Mark Goodwin".
• "Walter Prime": "Prime" isn't the character's last name.
• The Congress and The Jesus Rolls shouldn't sort by "The".
• "Archangel Gabriel": Not sure. Our article generally calls him "Gabriel".
• "Captain Murphy": M's.
• "Lord Hater": I'm guessing H's.
• "Dr. George Forrester": F's.
• Episode: "Jon Hamm Wears A Light Blue Shirt & Silver Watch": should be in the Notes column.
• "Mayor Webb": W's.
• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• Checking the FLC criteria:
• 1. Nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the tables.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements.
• 6. It is stable.
• Support, assuming you action the above as you see fit. The support is also provisional on a clean source review ... I'll come back and take another look at that time. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 04:58, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 12:56, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 01:37 18 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 11:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC).

---

Timeline of the Battle of Tumu

Nominator(s): Min968 (talk) 04:52, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

The chronological list presents one of the worst military defeats in Ming history. I would highly appreciate any suggestions to improve it. Thank you for your time. Min968 (talk) 04:52, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

Here'll be some comments from me. Arconning (talk) 13:26, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

@Arconning Done. Min968 (talk) 15:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

@Arconning Are you still following this topic? Min968 (talk) 12:38, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Support and passing image review. Arconning (talk) 09:52, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

• Wikilink first mention of the measurement "li"
  • Done.
• "According to some accounts,", could this be more specific?
  • Wang Chen, according to some accounts, was killed by his own officers. The emperor was captured and on 3 September was sent to Esen's main camp near Hsüan-fu. Twitchett & Grimm 1988, p. 325
• "on the night of 2–3 September,", guessing this means that accounts either reported 2 or 3 September?
  • Done.

Image review

• File:英宗睿皇帝.jpg - Public Domain
  • Alt-text: "Emperor Yingzong wears a yellow robe and a black cap." to "Emperor Yingzong wearing a yellow robe and a black cap."
    • Done.
  • Caption: "Emperor Yingzong of Ming was captured by the Mongols during the Battle of Tumu", add a period at the end.
    • Done.
• File:Tumu Crisis.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• All of the images used within the article are relevant.

Comments

• Lead image could be made larger
• "This defeat had a significant impact on the military and also caused political instability in the Ming dynasty for years to come. It is considered one of the worst military defeats in Ming history and marked a significant shift in power along China's northern frontier between the Ming court and the Mongol tribes." - this doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere in the body, so it will need referencing
• Wang Zhen should be linked in the body as well as the lead
• " A group of officials, led by the Minister of Personnel, submitted a memorial" - I don't think you mean "memorial" there. Maybe "memorandum".....?
• "However, after a warning from a trusted eunuch commander—who had escaped the Battle of Yanghe Pass on 3 August by hiding in tall grass—that proceeding" - as the "hiding in the grass" bit has already been established, I think this can be changed to "However, after a warning from the eunuch commander who had escaped the Battle of Yanghe Pass on 3 August by hiding in tall grass that proceeding"
• "A new rear guard of 40,000 (or 30,000 or 50,000) cavalry" - if all these estimates are equally valid, I would avoid making one more prominent than the others and I would instead say "A new rear guard of either 30,000, 40,000 or 50,000 cavalry"
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:06, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude Done. Min968 (talk) 17:42, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Could you add an image of Wang Zhen?
  • Done.
• I would suggest rewriting "the matter was opposed by officials led by Minister of War Kuang Ye" to "officials led by Minister of War Kuang Ye opposed the matter".
  • Done.
• "He was assassinated in 1455, ending his short-lived supremacy." Is there any clue about who assassinated Esen Taishi?
  • Done.

Векочел (talk) 20:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

@Векочел Done. Min968 (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• Support Векочел (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Don't have access to the books, so AGFing there, but passing the formatting and promoting. --PresN 15:12, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 15:13 17 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 00:28, 18 March 2026 (UTC).

---

2023 Men's T20 World Cup Africa regional final

Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 09:37, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Now that my other nom has two support votes; here's my next nom returning to the 2024 Men's T20 World Cup topic; there's more where this comes from... Vestrian24Bio 09:37, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility notes, no action needed:

• When you're using a table to organize things not as a row-column data table but just as a layout thing to save space, like in Squads, according to WP:LTAB you should add |role="none" to the table (so, {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left; margin:auto" role="none") so that screen-reader software won't treat it as a data table. (Done for you)
• I got lost for a bit in the module code, but when you're using Sports table, as you do at {{2023 Men's T20 World Cup Africa Qualifier Regional Final}}, you have to set the "title" attribute to add a caption (now done for you)
• The way {{Single-innings cricket match}} uses subtables for positioning is extremely suspect, but I've adjusted it to be an LTAB as well rather than rewrite the whole thing.

--PresN 14:41, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your helps! Vestrian24Bio 12:47, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

source review

• prose is clear and concise
• link bye to Bye (sports)
• verifiable sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 14, 16, 17, 18
• 4 can include author name
• sources 11, 12 and 13 won't load
• Mohammed Issa not found in 15, otherwise it is good
• 19, 21 are dead
• 20 doesn't verify "first match", presumably this was covered in 19? 20's author is missing

Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 21:20, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

@EasternShah:

• Refs 11, 12 and 13 seems to be working now.
• Added archives for 19 &21.

All else done. Vestrian24Bio 12:47, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

issa is a player in this tournament right? can you find a ref to include him I think that this may be fine Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 13:31, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

@EasternShah: done now. Vestrian24Bio 13:21, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Source review pass Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 16:04, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• The tables are missing row and column scopes (see MOS:DTAB
• The table under "Teams and qualification" doesn't sort the dates correctly
• Under "Squads" the abbreviations are not explained
• "ESPNcricinfo" is italicized under "Points table" but not "Squads"
• "ESPNcricinfo" appears in small text under "Points table" but not "Squads", also it's placement compared to the table is inconsistent
• Most of the "ESPNcricinfo" sources have MOS:DASH violations
• Under "Fixtures", why are both team names bolded? usually only the winning team is in bold
• Why are external links used in "Fixtures" and not citations?

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 11:18, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant:

• The abbreviations in the squads table are linked to respective pages.
• Teams in the fixtures are bolded by default in the {{Single-innings cricket match}} template.
• Scorecards are generally given as external links across cricket articles and other sports as well.

All else done. Vestrian24Bio 13:12, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 06:04, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (3/7/26)

Lead

• You have a self-link in the first paragraph (regional final).
• Recommend wikilinks wicket.

Teams and qualification

• "The top two sides of each sub-regional qualifier advanced to the regional final, where they joined Namibia and Zimbabwe, who received byes due to their participation..."
• The table is unnecessarily wide... Is the width set?

Squads

• There needs to be a key above the tables identifying abbreviations you use, like C and WK.
• Recommend setting the table to right-justification to match the others, as opposed to being centered as it is right now.

Points table

• You will also need a key here to explain these abbreviations in the table header.

Fixtures

• None of this is sourced.

User:Vestrian24Bio: Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:58, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

• regional final isn't linked, it's bolded intentionally to identify the topic of this page.
• No width is set for the qualification table.
• c and wk are linked to their respective articles.
• The squads table uses margin:auto which aligns center by default.
• Points table headers use the {{abbr.}} function, it provides a tooltip for abbreviation.

@Bgsu98: all else done. Vestrian24Bio 03:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Support. I apologize; I somehow missed out on following up on this review. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:47, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Vestrian24Bio: Wikipedia says your sources no. 8 and 20 are duplicates, so you will want to check on that. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:49, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Supporting and promoting. --PresN 15:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 15:13 17 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:25, 17 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of spalacids

Nominator(s): PresN 01:21, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey y'all, mammal list #70 in our perpetual series and rodent list #15: Spalacidae. We continue through the Myomorpha suborder, aka "things shaped like mice", with another of the small families, the mole-rats. There's 23 species of these little guys, digging burrows underground with big teeth and tiny eyes, which (like the guy in the lede image) are sometimes so covered in fur as the be invisible. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 01:21, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• My only comment is that linking seems to be inconsistent. "Shrubland" and "grassland" are each linked only once, but "rhizomes" is linked multiple times. Also, if you intend to link any given item once only, make sure it's on the first usage, as "tubers" seems to only be linked on something like the third usage -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Fixed! --PresN 17:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:40, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/24/26)

• You could consider wikilinking bamboo.
• No other issues with the prose or tables.
• I'll go ahead and support right now. I'll try to come back a little later to do the source review unless someone else gets to it first. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

• All images have appropriate licenses.
• Alt text is present and sufficient.
• Prose seems fine as well, so support and pass image & accessibility reviews. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 19:57, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Octave

• No issues passing source review: citations to reliable sources are formatted consistently, and spotchecks have turned up no problems. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 17:57, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

IAR promotion, as I'm the only delegate here for another month or so. --PresN 15:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 15:12 17 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:25, 17 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of Michelin-starred restaurants in the Philippines

Nominator(s): 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm nominating this list because it has good prose, an engaging lead, lists all starred restaurants and describes related and important stuff on the lead, it is easy to navigate and accessible, and it is stable. I don't know what else to say here. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• "Philippines" should be linked on first mention

• Done

• "The Michelin Guides were founded by" I don't think "founded" is the right word to use here

• Changed to created

• "Manila and its other cities in the area" -> "Manila and other cities in the area" or something similar

• Done

• I feel that its somewhat difficualt to figure out what "Mega Manila" is from context

• Changed to Metro Manila and Cavite

• ".[5][1][6][7]" do all four citations support the entire preceding paragraph? Or can they be spread out to avoid the mess of four citations?

• Spread the best I could

• Link "Southeast Asia"

• Done

• "Michelin Guide" appears both with and without italics

• Italicized all instances

• "(DoT)" -> "(DOT)", sources and the relevent wiki article capitalize the O

• Done

• Ref 5 has an MOS:ALLCAPS issue

• Fixed

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 08:40, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant: Replied to all. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:49, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 09:09, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• The lead image could be made larger

• I'm regularly careful around fixed pixels in images, but done.

• Fixed pixel sizes should not be used, so I changed it to use the upright parameter -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

• "The inaugural edition of the Michelin Guide in the Philippines was launched in October 2025 at the Manila Marriott Hotel for the year 2026, which covers Manila and other cities in the area, and Cebu City,[5][1][6] officially becoming the fifth country in Southeast Asia to have a Michelin Guide" - this sentence doesn't work grammatically, as the current structure/wording indicates that the guide itself became the fifth country in Southeast Asia to have a Michelin Guide. I suggest re-writing it as "The inaugural edition of the Michelin Guide in the Philippines was launched in October 2025 at the Manila Marriott Hotel for the year 2026, covering Manila and other cities in the area, and Cebu City.[5][1][6] The Philippines became the fifth country in Southeast Asia to have a Michelin Guide"

• Done

• "one having two stars while the rest having one" => "one having two stars and the rest having one"

• Done

• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: replied to everything. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 09:34, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• It says Location (province) in the table, but the table puts cities in brackets, not provinces like the heading indicates. But the first one is province, and no city. This needs to be cleared up. Mattximus (talk) 21:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

I just fixed it myself, short list, easy to do! Mattximus (talk) 21:20, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Reference 5 should get an archive link though, since it's so important to this list. Mattximus (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

  @Mattximus: done. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 22:44, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Cavan121012 (source review)

Since you did a source review on mine, I thought I'd return the favour. Checked all references and they are all good, I've only got a few suggestions

• Not essential but I would recommend archiving all of the references, there's only four without them
• Just for consistency I'd wikilink the name of the website in the references, like you've done in refs 1 and 7

Since the references are all good though and these are only suggestions, I'm happy to Support. Cavan121012 (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 15:12, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 15:50 12 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1963

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Here's my third nomination in this series. This was a weird year in terms of the top spot of the Hot 100. Out of 20 number ones (discounting the one that rolled over from the year before), 18 were by acts that had never reached number one before, and out of those 18 acts, 17 never reached the top spot again in their careers. Bizarre...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• I didn't see any issues in the prose.
• There was one accessibility issue that I fixed.
• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:19, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Image review + comment

Here'll be an image review from me! Arconning (talk) 14:38, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• File:The Fireballs 1959.JPG - Public Domain, source link is dead so an archive link must be supplied or the image needs to be replaced.
  • Replaced -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:41, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
• File:Kyu sakamoto.png - Public Domain
• File:Stevie Wonder 1967 (1).jpg - CC0
• File:The Chiffons.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Lesley Gore.jpg - Public Domain
• All images are relevant to the article, have alt-text for accessibility for users who use screen readers, and have proper captioning.
  • Just the one comment and I think we'd be good to go.
    • Sakamoto's song was the first song by an Asian singer to reach number 1 so that information could be included within the article.
      • @Arconning: added -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:40, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  Pass Arconning (talk) 06:20, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Source review

• Ref 8 has an error
• Links are consistent
• Dates are consistent
• Spot checks found nothing

Support Nothing major, just one fixable citation error. Olliefant (she/her) 15:55, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

I think you meant ref 6, if so that is now fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:08, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/19/26)

You know I can't step away without reviewing your article first. I'll come back to this later today. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:27, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

This is the only sentence that caught my attention: ""Sugar Shack" was also the final number one on Billboard's Hot R&B Singles chart before that listing was discontinued for what would prove to be a period of just over one year." --> I strongly dislike the use of "would" to describe otherwise normal events in the past tense (versus the past conditional). Recommend rewording with something along the lines of "for what ended up just being a period of one year" or something along that line. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:35, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: - made a change, see what you think..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:36, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Perfect. Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:07, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 15:50, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 15:50 12 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2026 (UTC).

---

2017 NHL expansion draft

Nominator(s): The Kip ^(contribs) 07:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Was originally targeting GA for this, but realized thanks to the nom for 2021 NHL expansion draft that FL would be a more appropriate target. I've spent the last few days overhauling the article, significantly improving the refs. I've also turned the long list of concession trades into a table, and prose-ified the "Post-draft" section. I've also made various updates to bring it in line with the 2021 article, currently under FL consideration as well. The Kip ^(contribs) 07:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Note to the outstanding comments, life's come at me lately and I haven't had time to get around to fully addressing things - promise I will soon, and am still interested in getting this to FL. The Kip ^(contribs) 05:41, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Quick comment

On the table, italics cannot be the only means of conveying information per MOS:ACCESS. Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:11, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Done and sorted. The Kip ^(contribs) 08:24, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "After Las Vegas' expansion bid was approved in June 2016, one year beforehand, " - last three words are redundant
• "Vegas selected 30 players from each of the league's franchises" - if they had selected 30 players from each of the franchises, that would have been a total of 900 players. They actually selected one player from each of the franchises
• "The Vegas bid was the first "Big Four" major professional sports league to place a franchise in Las Vegas" => "The Vegas bid would make the NHL the first of the "Big Four" major professional sports league to place a franchise in Las Vegas"
• "but the NHL previously had" => "although the NHL had previously had"
• "was named Las Vegas' first-ever general manager " => "was named Las Vegas' first general manager "
• "Five days after formally entering the league on March 1, 2017,[10] the Golden Knights signed Canadian center Reid Duke to a three-year, entry-level contract on March 6" - if it was five days after March 1 then obviously it was March 6, no need to state both
• "making him the franchise's first-ever player." => "making him the franchise's first player."
• "The initial proposal of the rules for the draft were decided upon" => "The initial proposal of the rules for the draft was decided upon" (the subject of the sentence is "proposal", which is singular
• "or, one goaltender and eight skaters regardless of position" => "or one goaltender and eight skaters regardless of position"
• "Because the NHL wanted to ensure the competitive viability of any new teams" => "Because the NHL wanted to ensure the competitive viability of the new team"
• "would lose one top-four defencemen" => "would lose one top-four defenceman"
• "and had to still be contracted for the 2017–18 season." => "and were still be contracted for the 2017–18 season."
• "or became a restricted free agent in 2017" => "or have become a restricted free agent in 2017"
• "RFA or UFA, one per team" - what do these initialisms mean?
• "as third lowest finishing team" = "as the third-lowest finishing team"
• " they were subject to same draft lottery rules" => " they were subject to the same draft lottery rules"
• "The NHL's deputy commissioner, Bill Daly, said that teams that do not follow the expansion draft rules" => "The NHL's deputy commissioner, Bill Daly, said that teams that did not follow the expansion draft rules"
• Draft results table should sort based on surname, not forename
• "Center Jonathan Marchessault would go on to win the Conn Smythe Trophy with Vegas in 2023" - complete sentence so needs a full stop
• ....and the same for all the other photo captions in that section and the next one
• "until was his contract was traded" - there's a stray extra "was" in there
• "First-overall-pick Calvin Pickard" - no reason for those hyphens
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude Sorry for the delay - all taken care of. The Kip ^(contribs) 07:37, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:12, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Accessibility review

• Section links aren't allowed in section headers per MOS:NOSECTIONLINKS
• Why does 2017 NHL expansion draft#Trades not have any columns? To the average reader (like myself), this makes no sense.
• In the same section, colors need a key or need to be removed if they do not convey information.
• Scopes are needed in the Draft results section for both the columns and rows. Put the row scopes on the players name, not the number.
• For the keys, if you want that is (I won't hold it against you), you could create a key table that some articles use.
• Image accessibility is good.

Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 01:28, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

@Cowboygilbert My bad, somehow got tripped up and thought your comments were the user below. Everything on the list has been taken care of. The Kip ^(contribs) 05:06, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

There is also a situation with the table under Trades. You cannot use <br> to simulate another row within the same cell. For example, you have Buffalo Sabres concession and 6th-round pick in 2017 (#161 overall) within the same cell with a pseudo line dividing them. That whole table is very difficult to follow. Perhaps you should have three columns ("Other team", Concession, and Vegas selection) plus the column for References. This is just a rough mock-up:

"Other team"	Concession	Vegas selection	Ref.
Buffalo Sabres	6th-round pick in 2017 (#161 overall)	William Carrier	[Insert reference here]

Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:17, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 The table format is pulled from the trade tables we use at transaction pages (ex. 2025–26 NHL transactions#Trades) - I disagree that there's an issue with the colors (there to visually differentiate each row) or <hr> lines. Never heard of there being problems with using <br> in tables, either. I can add column headers, however, and I'll take care of the rest of the concerns as well. The Kip ^(contribs) 06:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

User:The Kip: I apologize; that was from an earlier draft of my comment. I was having trouble following this table, and the pseudo lines in each cell made it appear as if the information on the top of one cell corresponded to the information in the top half of the adjacent cell. There is nothing wrong with using <br> as long as it's not used to simulate artificial rows across cells. I still maintain that the current layout is poor and I still encourage you to reformat it. For example, there is no reason to have "Vegas selection" repeated over and over. As for the use of gray, that wasn't my comment, and as long as it is not conveying information, which it's not, it shouldn't be a problem. I don't think it's necessary, but that is purely a personal opinion and not grounded in any policy. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:59, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 I've opted to reformat based on the table you suggested. Please take a look and let me know if it's up to par. Borrowed the row scopes from another of my FLs at List of Vegas Golden Knights draft picks so they still look normal rather than like headers. The Kip ^(contribs) 08:37, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

User:The Kip: That is such a good improvement! However, you will still need rowscopes. You can use the code ! scope="row" style="text-align:left;font-weight:normal" so the text doesn't appear in bold if that's what you want. Stylistically, it's up to you. All of the tables will need rowscopes; it looks like some of them already do. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:49, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 I believe it was just the concessions one lacking it, which I've taken care of - the protection lists seem to already have it. The Kip ^(contribs) 22:16, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Personally, I would replace the # on the one table with something like {{Abbr|No.|Number}}. If I have a chance tomorrow, I will do a full review of your article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:47, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

It's been done. The Kip ^(contribs) 04:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Lead

• The standard is to not have any citations in the lead. Anything stated in the lead should theoretically be restated elsewhere in the article. So you have two citations (sources no. 1 and 2) that should be brought down into the main body of the text, and if that information is not there, it should be added. I wouldn't copy word-for-word; I would slightly rephrase it.

Background

• "The Vegas bid would make the NHL the first "Big Four" major professional sports league to place a franchise in Las Vegas, though the league previously had a limited presence in the city with annual pre-season games, beginning with an outdoor game in 1991 and the Frozen Fury series held each year since 1997." Is this sourced anywhere?
• What is currently source no. 5 requires a subscription or an account; it should reflect that in the citation.
• "the Golden Knights signed Canadian center Reid Duke to a three-year, entry-level contract, making him the franchise's first player." This needs a source.

Rules

• You have some instances of numbers larger than 10 being spelled out and others where they are rendered as numbers. Whichever style you choose, they should be consistent.

Tables

• The tables look great now and appear to be properly structured per MOS:ACCESS.

Post-draft

• "Not all players selected by the Golden Knights in the Expansion Draft remained with the team."

User:The Kip: I swear, I've reviewed a similar article to this in the past. Did you submit another hockey draft article through FLC recently? Anyway, please let me know if you have any questions about my comments or suggestions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 Sorry for the delay:

• Moved the info to two different sections, along with the citations.
• Frozen Fury and the 1991 outdoor game are sort of self-sourced to their respective articles (1991 one wasn't previously linked, I added it), but I've added a cite for them being the first major pro team in Vegas.
• Opted to go for numbers for anything over ten.

Everything else has been taken care of. The Kip ^(contribs) 07:31, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:23, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• The table in the Trades section is missing its caption.
• The logo in the infobox is missing alt-text.
• "third-line forward" - explain, or wikilink.
• "departing in free agency" - explain, or wikilink.
• I didn't see any other problems with prose or accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:43, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 Point by point on this:

  • I'm not sure what you mean by a table caption, unless you mean title, in which case I'm not sure if one is necessary. I've added one anyways, though.
  • Done.
  • I've wikilinked Line (ice hockey).
  • Free agency is already wikilinked/explained in the "Rules" section.

  The Kip ^(contribs) 20:55, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Source review

• Spot checks found nothing
• Source linking is inconsistent
• Sources use slashdates, DMY, and MDY are used interchangeably, they should all be using one format
• Some citations call it "Sportsnet.ca" and some call it "Sportsnet", please standardize this
• Some citations call it "nhl.com" and some call it "NHL.com" please make all the latter as its an acronym
• The publisher and website parameters are used interchangeably. Please standardize this to prevent the inconsistent italics
• Ref 3 cut "Puck Daddy" and list "Yahoo! Sports" as the website
• Ref 9 is not dead and should be marked as such
• Refs 15-16, 29, 31-36 are missing the website
• Ref 16 is missing the author
• Ref 18 is listing the authors incorrectly
• Refs 18, 22 should be marked as "subscription required"
• Refs 27, 41 lists the publisher when no others do
• Ref 30 "[NEWS]" -> "[News]" per MOS:ALLCAPS
• Ref 44 is dead
• Refs 54, 56, 58 should be marked as "via NHL.com"
• Why is "Pro Hockey Rumors" a reliable source?
• Why is "SinBin.vegas" a reliable source?

That's what I found, ping me when done Olliefant (she/her) 08:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant Point by point-ish:

• I've converted all to MDY as per American English.
• Standardized/mostly fixed the website links. My general rule of thumb is to use "work" for newspapers/publications (ex. Las Vegas Review-Journal) and "website"/"publisher" for everything else.
• Re: "via," I've opted to instead use publisher with teams.
• Pro Hockey Rumors is generally considered reliable by WP:NHL as a companion site of MLB Trade Rumors, which is considered reliable in the wider baseball world. It was also difficult to find other sources succinctly stating that Bischoff was in Vegas' organization that entire time, though it's self-evident by the fact he continuously played for Vegas' minor league affiliates and repeatedly re-signed with either Vegas or said affiliate.
• SinBin.Vegas is considered the Golden Knights' main beat blog, similar to Russian Machine Never Breaks, and a generally reliable source for news about the team.

The Kip ^(contribs) 07:41, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from ZooBlazer

Most things have been covered already, but a couple of smaller things:

• Add alt text for the infobox image
• Multiple references need archives

Good job overall with the article. -- ZooBlazer 03:32, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

@ZooBlazer Alt text was added with MPGuy's review above, and I used IABot to archive most of the sources. Did the remaining handful manually. The Kip ^(contribs) 08:11, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Looks good. Support -- ZooBlazer 08:41, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

@The Kip: There's outstanding comments going back a month now; do you intend to continue with this nomination? --PresN 01:51, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

@PresN Yes, life’s caught up with me a bit and I’ve not had the time to address those concerns. I intend to do so in the next few days. The Kip ^(contribs) 02:22, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Will try to do this on Saturday. The Kip ^(contribs) 05:32, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Or more likely tomorrow. The Kip ^(contribs) 19:32, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

The source review concerns appear addressed and I don't see any other issues there, so passing that; promoting. --PresN 15:50, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 14:40 7 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of World Heritage Sites in Bahrain

Nominator(s): Tone 08:00, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Bahrain has three WHS and six tentative sites. Standard style. This is a shorter list, I'll try to be more active when replying to comments. Tone 08:00, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/14/26)

1. Barbar Temple: "The archaeological site comprises three temples, built one atop another between third and second millennium BCE." --> Should there be a "the" before "third"?
2. Hawar Islands Reserve: "...and is home to a population of dugong." --> Shouldn't "dugong" be plural?

@Tone: Only a very few comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:54, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Fixed both, thanks! Tone 17:09, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:11, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

Really glad to see you're still doing these WHS lists, Tone – image review forthcoming. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 17:59, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

As promised:

• File:Bahrain Fort 3.jpg: source and licensing check out. This is marked on Flickr as all rights reserved, but a look at the licensing history shows that the uploader changed the copyright status after the photo was uploaded to Commons, so the old CC BY 2.0 applies.
• File:Muharraq Bayt Siyadi 1.jpg: uploader's own work, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, but is missing alt text.
• File:A'ali Burial Mounds.jpg: source and licensing check out, though I did replace the URL with an archived link on Commons.
• File:Middle Dilmun Mass Grave A212.JPG: uploader's own work, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
• File:Barbar Temple.jpg: source and licensing check out.
• File:Sur burial mounds.jpg: source and licensing check out, though I did replace the URL with an archived link on Commons.
• File:Manama skyline.jpg: the notice about Bahrain lacking freedom of panorama gave me pause at first, but after consulting Wikipedia:Freedom of panorama and given the Bahrain World Trade Center's distance in the background, I'm going to give this a pass on licensing. The source also checks out, though the date taken on Flickr is quite some ways off lol.
• File:Awali Bahrain overview 1959.png: okay, this one I'm not quite sure about. I'll AGF on the dead link source, but this is missing a US-specific public domain tag on Commons, and I can't find one here that would work.

Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 00:25, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! I added the missing text, do you think I should do something about the oil settlement image or does it work? Tone 15:53, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

@Tone: Apologies for the late reply, some rather disruptive and unexpected things happened IRL recently. I would err on the side of caution and remove the oil settlement image. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 22:42, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

No worries. I agree, better to remove. Thanks! Tone 09:23, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

No problem. Happy to support. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 10:55, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "known from the Sumerian sources" => "known from Sumerian sources"
• "Located at the strategic location in the Persian Gulf" => "Located at a strategic location in the Persian Gulf"
• "share architectural features with the Sumerian temples" => "share architectural features with Sumerian temples"
• There seems to be a mix of UK and US spellings, as I can see both "centralised" and "modernization". Pick one and use it consistently -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:21, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed, thanks! Tone 09:53, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Source review

• 5, 6, 7, 11, 14 pass
• for source 12, sea cows include dugongs, but not all sea cows are dugongs. Please change this; otherwise, source 12 is good.
• Capital, Northern, Southern→Capital, Northern, and Southern Regions
• parts of the seashore→parts of the seashore of Muharraq Island
• It is the earliest example of an oil settlement in the Persian Gulf, with European-style urban planning that included public buildings, homes for an international and multicultural community of oil specialists and their families, as well as local population, and leisure spaces. this is a massive sentence, please split it into 2-3
• Some of the introduced concepts included→Some of the introduced concepts include

Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 17:15, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks! "Capital, Northern, and Southern" are corresponding governorates, not regions, I wouldn't change that. Tone 10:21, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

pass source review Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 19:29, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

• Use straight apostrophes (') rather than curly ones (’) for "Qal'at" in the lead and site description per MOS:CURLY.
• For the description of Khor Hamad Town Tumuli Moundfield, "... a circular wall which is now not visible anymore" sounds redundant (now + anymore); consider removing "anymore".
• The publisher for the third reference should be UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 14:36, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

  @Shwabb1: I did the first and last as you stated, but for the second I removed now since it flows better than way imo. Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 20:16, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

  Support. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 20:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 14:40, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 14:40 7 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of works by Gu Yanwu

Nominator(s): Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 13:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

My first FLC in a while! Gu Yanwu was a scholar during the last days of the Ming dynasty. Upset at the very violent Qing conquest, he wandered around China for most of his life, compiling and commentating on historical works. He had a very negative perspective on essentially all Chinese philosophy since the time of the Confucian classics, but ended up laying the groundwork for future generations of scholars, leading to the concept of Hanxue - Han studies.

The list here draws from Ian Johnston's listing of his bibliography, which itself is based off lists by Jean-François Vergnaud and Jan Hagman. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 13:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Gu Yanwu (Chinese: 顧炎武, art name Tinglin) was a Chinese scholar active during the transition from the Ming to Qing dynasty" => "Gu Yanwu (Chinese: 顧炎武, art name Tinglin) was a Chinese scholar active during the transition from the Ming dynasty to the Qing dynasty"
  • Done.-G
• Also, can you give some indication of when that was, as presently there's nothing in the lead to indicate whether he lived 200 or 2000 years ago
  • Done.-G
• "published them for the first time in the collect Tinglin yishu" => "published them for the first time in the collection Tinglin yishu"
  • Done.-G
• "a unit roughly equivalent to chapters" => "a unit roughly equivalent to a chapter"
• Descriptions which consist only of one sentence fragment (e.g. "A collection of Gu's essays and writings, including his political treatises written after the fall of Ming.") should not have a full stop
• Done.-G
• "the Confucian classics" - appropriate link? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
• Added.-G

@ChrisTheDude: Thank you very much! Added. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 04:02, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• wikilink "epigraphic"
• You can consider making the table sortable for the first 3 columns only.
• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:45, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

  Please take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of constituencies of the Jharkhand Legislative Assembly/archive1 if you have the time and inclination. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:20, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/15/26)

• Lead

1. What are gazetteers?

• • Clarified.-G
• List

1. I would recommend retitling this section Works by Gu Yanwu. You can always hide the table caption so as to avoid the redundancy.

• • Done. Wouldn't hiding the caption break accessibility?-G

1. I would recommend left-justifying the first column so as to match all of the other columns.

• • I can't get this to work; I think it's something to do with the Chinese text. The table is set to left-justify.-G

1. You might consider wikilinking calligraphy, Daoism, Buddhism, Shandong.

• • Done.-G

@Generalissima: A very interesting article! Please let me know once you have had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:04, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I forgot to add my support, even though this has already been promoted. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:49, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Source review and misc comments

Another stellar article! I don't see any issues on the sourcing - everything is from reliable academic source, cited and formatted properly, and the references I could access have good source-prose continuity without plagiarizing, so I say review passed. Some minor comments:

• per MOS:HANZI the characters for Gu Yanwu's name don't need to be included because his article is linked. However, I do notice that sometimes his surname is appended on his art name, so I don't have much of an opinion on what makes more sense of readers for Gu's name. Maybe the characters for Tinglin should also be added, since it plays a bigger role in this list rather than his main article?
  • Good idea; clarified.-G
• The second time Pan Lei is mentioned, shouldn't it just be by his surname Pan instead of his full name?
  • Done.-G
• For the translation of 亭林遺書, shouldn't his name just be Tinglin and not Gu Tinglin?
  • Fixed.-G

Thanks for responding in advance. MSG17 (talk) 12:49, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

@Generalissima: There are at least two sets of feedback here. 😃 Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:55, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

@Generalissima: This nomination has been open longer than is typical, and has some comments that are a couple weeks old. Do you intend to address them? --PresN 02:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh, I'm so sorry. I completely forgot about this. Yes, I will address them in the next day or two. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:19, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

• @MSG17:@Bgsu98: I think I got to all these. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 08:51, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

  Looks good to me! I don't see any other issues, so I'll give my support. MSG17 (talk) 14:33, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Promoting (there were some minor technical changes requested that the nominator stated they did not know how to do, so I just did them myself to move this along). --PresN 14:40, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 02:39 4 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of sminthids

Nominator(s): PresN 23:39, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey y'all, mammal list #69 in our perpetual series and rodent list #14: Sminthidae. We continue through the Myomorpha suborder, aka "things shaped like mice", with the birch mice. There's 16 species of these little guys, jumping and climbing on things in Eurasia, and their little grippy paws are part of why they're in a different family from other mice. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 23:39, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/6/26)

(This comment was originally posted as a drive-by comment): That mouse is too cute! 🥰 I’ll come back to review this tomorrow. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:20, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Lead

• You might consider wikilinking wetlands and omnivore. @PresN: I'll go ahead and support now since those are simply suggestions. There are no issues with the table. Cute little mice! Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:44, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Image review

• File:Sicista betulina 122150166.jpg CC BY 4.0
• File:Sicista concolor.jpg CC0
• File:Sicista subtilis trizona.jpg CC BY 2.0
• File:Sicista betulina 03.JPG CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Sicista betulina range map.png CC BY-SA 3.0 link dead
• File:Sicista severtzovi.jpg CC BY-SA 3.0 link dead
• File:Sicista subtilis, southern birch mouse.jpg CC BY-SA 3.0 https://www.biolib.cz/en/taxonimage/id173910/?taxonid=20714&type=1 resized photographs can be freely used on any pages for non commercial emphasis mine; unless I am mistaken, Wikipedia and Commons are not compatible with the NC tag. otherwise the image is fine

Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 04:32, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

@EasternShah: Fixed the dead links, and removed the subtilis image. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 12:40, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Support The alt-text and prose are good. The prose follows the standard set by other similar lists. It is not confusing, and understandable for non-experts. Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 23:23, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• The images in the table are missing alt-texts.
• See if you have the time to create an article for Tsimlyansk birch mouse, even if it is just a stub. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: Whoops, added the alt texts. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 12:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

  Support on accessibility. Prose as well, but you already have 3 supports for that. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:41, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Support - nothing from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:26, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

I made Tsimlyansk birch mouse just now. Are vulnerable and near-threatened species not mentioned alongside the endangered ones in the leading paragraphs, usually? -- Reconrabbit 15:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

• @Reconrabbit: No, I've just been calling out the endangered/critical species in the lede. Thanks for making the article! --PresN 15:50, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

  OK, awesome. One correction: S. kazbegica is listed by IUCN as living in forest and grassland, not just grassland. Otherwise, all of the IUCN listings have their population sizes (unknown), trends, and habitats reflected here correctly. -- Reconrabbit 16:03, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

  @Reconrabbit: Weird, I have a script that pulls the IUCN data directly from them, not sure how that one get changed. Fixed. --PresN 19:19, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

  This list has my support. -- Reconrabbit 19:30, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Source review

So cute! Anyways, enough distraction. An excellent reference section as usual, Pres: happy to give this a pass on sourcing as is. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 18:36, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

IAR close- as I'm the only one around for another month and a half, I have to close my own noms. So, promoting. --PresN 02:39, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 02:39 4 March 2026 FACBot (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2026 (UTC).

---

List of accolades received by United 93 (film)

Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 11:33, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

United 93 is a docudrama action film film written and directed by Paul Greengrass, who co-produced it with Tim Bevan, Eric Fellner, and Lloyd Levin. The film largely chronicles the events aboard the United Airlines Flight 93, one of the four hijacked flights during the September 11 attacks on America; Flight 93 was the only plane to not hit its intended target, due to the intervention of its passengers and crew. The film also covers the experiences of government officials and air traffic controllers, many of whom are played by themselves, as they witness the other events of the attacks unfold that day. This is my thirteenth film accolades list to be nominated for featured list status, and I largely based the format off of the accolades lists for The Artist, Barbie, The Big Short, CODA, Dune, Dunkirk, If Beale Street Could Talk, 1917, Oppenheimer, The Shape of Water, Slumdog Millionaire, and Wicked. Birdienest81talk 11:33, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by

• Please copy the first line of this nomination to the lead of the list. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:50, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

• @MPGuy2824: Done - I mostly copied the first line of the nomination to the actual list with the addition of the demonym "British" to be consistent with film articles and list.

--Birdienest81talk 09:01, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/8/26)

Lead

• The very first sentence is not an actual sentence. I agree with MPGuy2824 that you could use your opening to this nomination as the opening to your article.
• "docudrama action film" is a WP:SEAOFBLUE; recommend sticking an "and" in between to break them up.
• "...one of the four hijacked flights during the September 11 attacks on America" --> The "on America" sounds awkward. Recommend removing altogether.
• The caption photo should end with a period.

Table

• There are no issues with the formatting of the table.

@Birdienest81: Let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:18, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Done - I have read all your comments, and have made the necessary corrections and adjustments based off of them.

--Birdienest81talk 09:05, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:29, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Others have picked up that the first sentence is something of a jumble of words, not a coherent sentence
• Image caption needs a full stop as it is a sentence
• That's it, I think -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:56, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: Done - Most of your comments we're mentioned by the previous reviewers. And therefore I have addressed all off yours.

--Birdienest81talk 12:50, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• The caption should be screen reader only (using Template:sronly)
• [docudrama] [action film] is an MOS:SOB violation
• Both DMY and MDY dates are used interchangeably, this should be standardized
• Notes C and D need a citation
• Anything from The New York Times, LA Times, or the Chicago Tribune should be marked as "subscription needed"
• For the "American Film Institute Awards" I don't think "Won" is the right term given it was a list
• I don't think the "2006 in film" link is needed in "See also"

Thats what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 07:35, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant: I've read all the comments and have made corrections and adjustments based on the comments except one. The American Film Institute Awards listed the Top 10 Films of the Year with no regards to how each film is ranked (1st, 2nd, 3rd place, etc.) What term do you want since it would be inaccurate to give a ranking, and also it is still technically a win since the film was included as part of a list with no ranking, and the film's citation as on of the top 10 is of an award in itself?

--Birdienest81talk 09:44, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Support fine as it is Olliefant (she/her) 17:44, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Support fine as it is, Olliefant (she/her) 17:47, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

GiftedIceCream

• The film grossed $76.3 million on a $15 million budget.[9] Source says the film grossed $76.7 million. As the film is British, it should use Pound sterling.
• The table links multiple people way to many times. See MOS:OVERLINK(Greengrass, etc)
  • Jumping in to point out that MOS:OVERLINK says that repeated links in tables are permissible. Duplicate linking in stand-alone and embedded lists is permissible if it significantly aids the reader. This is most often the case when the list is presenting information that could just as aptly be formatted in a table, and is expected to be parsed for particular bits of data, not read from top to bottom. If only the first Greengrass entry in the table was linked and the reader chose to sort the table by date, suddenly the only linked mention of Greengrass would be the 13th such entry, buried somewhere in the middle of the table. This is not helpful to readers -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:54, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
• The Boston Society of Film Critics and the Toronto Film Critics Association is listed as "Runner Up" but the Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association is listed as "2nd place".
• The St. Louis Film Critics Association top 10 should have he same note as the American Film Institute Awards.

Ping when done. GiftedIceCream 14:38, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

@GiftedIceCream: I've read your comments and have made corrections to all but two points:

• As ChrisTheDude mentioned, MOS:OVERLINK is fine in stand-alone and embedded lists especially if the list is presented as a table. If the reader were to sort out the table by date using a mobile device, he or she would have to scroll down to the 13th entry to find the first link to director Paul Greengrass.
• I changed Boston Society of Film Critics from "runner-up" to "2nd place" since the article mentions that the recipients of the award explicitly mentions it ranking as such. However, I kept the Toronto Film Critics Association as "Runner-up" because unlike the Boston Society of Film Critics and the Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association, Toronto lists two films or recipients as runners-up and it is impossible to determine which of the two recipients or films placed 2nd or 3rd or if they tied for 2nd. We can't assume that they tied for 2nd place since the website makes no indication as such nor can we assume one or other ranked 2nd and 3rd. Those would be inaccurate information based on the citation given and would be deemed WP:OR.

Otherwise, I addressed everything else.

--Birdienest81talk 10:06, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Support GiftedIceCream 20:07, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 02:38, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.