Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indus Refinery Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 10:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Indus Refinery Limited

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Indus Refinery Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An abandoned project, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Störm (talk) 16:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

• Keep - Simply being an abandoned project does not make something non-notable. In this case there has clearly been sustained coverage of this project in national media making it an easy pass for WP:CORP. See the following: 1 2 3 4. FOARP (talk) 16:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The title should change to Indus Refinery Project and so its structure. The company is not notable. Störm (talk) 17:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Which is a great discussion to have on the article's talk page - or even a suitable basis for WP:BOLD edits - but not what AFD is for. FOARP (talk) 19:53, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Störm - I've expanded the article based on the references I found in my WP:Before. The company is clearly notable as it, ultimately, is the correct topic of this article which was widely covered over a long period of time. FOARP (talk) 08:58, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.