Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Wheeler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. General consensus to keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 05:30, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Chad Wheeler

Chad Wheeler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article's subject does not meet the criteria for notability of college athletes: "College athletes and coaches are notable if they have been the subject of non-trivial media coverage beyond merely a repeating of their statistics, mentions in game summaries, or other WP:ROUTINE coverage." Eddie Blick (talk) 01:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

• Delete lacks indepth coverage to show notability for a college athlete.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (blab) 17:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

• Comment. I have not yet done a detailed search to determine whether he passes WP:GNG, but a quick search shows that, in 2016, he was selected as a first-team All-American by at least one lesser-known selector (see here) and was also a first-team All-Pac-12 player (see here). A couple quick examples of significant coverage include: (1) this, and (2) this. Cbl62 (talk) 22:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
• Keep per the sources provided by Cbl62. RCFrance (talk) 00:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

• Weak keep, due to article being skimpy/skeletal. He won some notable awards.Knox490 (talk) 04:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
• Keep per Cbl62's sources. Also, since he's due to enter the draft this year, he may soon meet WP:GRIDIRON which would for sure put him over the top. ansh666 17:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.