Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BugTracker.NET
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 01:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- BugTracker.NET (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet any notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 19:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom. Essentially no coverage. One blog mentions that it used it was used in a project. Fails WP:GNG and software notability, see essay Wikipedia:Notability (software). Wikipedia article in existence since January 2008. --Bejnar (talk) 02:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references apart from one blog post. A search turned up this how-to article and more blog coverage, but no non how-to significant coverage in reliable sources.Dialectric (talk) 13:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.