Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3EA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

3EA

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

3EA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was removed, fails WP:NCORP, WP:GNG. Govvy (talk) 16:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

• Delete (possible G11 speedy): A former redirect repurposed by one WP:SPA, the blocked user 3EA Limited and then subsequently by a chorus of more WP:SPAs. Listings and a non-editorial piece reproduced in Business Standard are Trivial Coverage by WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches find another non-editorial Business Standard item () but not the coverage needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 17:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

• Alternatively, assuming a consensus that the consultancy firm 3EA Limited is not notable, the redirect to the Australian SBS Radio, reflecting its name between 1973 and 1978, can be restored, and protected to prevent future hijacking? AllyD (talk) 18:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

• Restore redirect per AllyD. Otherwise, this would qualify for A7 IMO. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
• Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability. Also, I don't think a redirect is appropriate seeing as there is no mention of 3EA in the main body of the SBS Radio article. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
• Delete as spam then restore the redirect and protect it. Pichpich (talk) 23:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:SPAM, WP:GNG, WP:MILL, and WP:NCORP. Laughably bad sourcing. Bearian (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.