Template talk:NATO relations
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 15 days ago by CaribDigita in topic Can there be some consensus on naming of articles?
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Can there be some consensus on naming of articles?
[edit]Is there some will- towards naming consensus for these article(s)?
- Some are "(Country name)–NATO relations" (for example : Albania–NATO relations).
- Some are "(Country name) in NATO" (for example : Canada in NATO).
- Some are "(Country name) and NATO" (for example : France and NATO).
Surely these articles can get their act together and be named under similar unified naming context? CaribDigita (talk) 19:27, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Template-Class military history pages
- Template-Class European military history pages
- European military history task force articles
- Template-Class North American military history pages
- North American military history task force articles
- Template-Class Cold War pages
- Cold War task force articles
- Template-Class Post-Cold War pages
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- NA-importance Cold War pages
- Template-Class International relations pages
- NA-importance International relations pages
- WikiProject International relations articles



