Template:Did you know nominations/Velký vlastenecký výlet

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by TarnishedPath talk 07:58, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Velký vlastenecký výlet

(

• Back to TM:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that a 2025 Czech documentary Velký vlastenecký výlet shows the impact of Russian disinformation, following three pro-Russian Czechs as they visit Ukraine during the ongoing war? Source: https://balkaninsight.com/2025/09/15/czech-documentary-on-russian-disinfo-over-ukraine-exposes-bitter-societal-rifts/ + https://www.polskieradio.pl/399/7979/Artykul/3555330,Wielka-wycieczka-ojczyzniana-Czeski-dokumentalista-zabral-zwolennikow-Putina-na-Ukraine
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/2025 livestreamed murder in Argentina

Created by Piotrus (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 570 past nominations.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:47, 28 September 2025 (UTC).

• General: Article is new enough and long enough
  New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting: - It's just a synopsis

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Piotrus: Nice work. Sources all check out and no copy-vio, some of the prose felt a little eh but I think it's fine. I don't find the hook interesting. I feel like there's a bunch of stuff in the article that could make a good hook, be it parts of the documentary or reactions to it. 1brianm7 (talk) 06:32, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

• • @1brianm7: I thought that the basic facts are interesting enough. But sure, if you suggests some ALTs, I can consider adopting them. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:19, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

@Piotrus: I'm not sure what adopting means, but some that come to mind are:

• ALT1: ... that a crew member of Velký vlastenecký výlet walked out after a protagonist justified rape?
• ALT2: ... that a documentary on the Czech reaction to the Russo–Ukrainian War was called "existentially exhausting"? 1brianm7 (talk) 22:18, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

@1brianm7: Thank you., I think ALT2 is too subjective, but ALT1 is fine-ish - but I am not sure if the real person recorded in this documentary fit the conceptual definition of the "cast member"? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

I’ve changed the “is” in ALT2 to “was called” and the “cast member” in ALT1 to “protagonist”, which sounds a bit weird to me but it was what I got from google translating some of the sources. Do either of those work for you? 1brianm7 (talk) 18:48, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Forgot to ping, @Piotrus: 1brianm7 (talk) 18:49, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

@1brianm7: Thanks, the definition of a protagonist seems fitting. As such I can adopt ALT1, and then I assume you can "tick" it. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:49, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok, I've never done this sort of adoption before, so hopefully its all kosher. 1brianm7 (talk) 01:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)