Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- ~2026-53205-77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 984 (AIV / Noticeboard disruption 2, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:39, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Blocked. Underlying IP blocked already. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:43, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53303-14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-41013-77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Rudolf Steiner was changed by ~2026-41013-77 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95526 on 2026-10-04T06:36:31+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 06:36, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- Pedestal101$ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 30 five times in the last 5 minutes (Large deletion from article by new editors, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:43, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- SBC79 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On General Conference (LDS Church): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Latest sock of LTA troll - recommend following the existing SPI case guidance. FyzixFighter (talk) 00:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- The contribution on this account does not strike me as GeraldFord. Izno (talk) 01:11, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- I could take it to SPI. I base this on the pattern of adding odd, weird trivia while trying to add a veneer of legitimacy by copying citations from elsewhere in the article. FyzixFighter (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- The contribution on this account does not strike me as GeraldFord. Izno (talk) 01:11, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- IAIO 2027 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Please see: Special:Log/VAIO 2026 (blocked). ~SG5536B 02:50, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- DHVlogger36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Creating a draft which is 100% a hoax, they did this before last December, which were their only ever edits on here. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 03:10, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:49, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-46481-61 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On 2028 Philippine barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan elections (diff): vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. User said he "cannot be blocked". Howard the Duck (talk) 03:28, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- Pbcdata (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Frequent LLM additions despite multiple warnings. Plasticwonder (Cat got your tongue?) 05:17, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-41013-77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) after final warning. --Serols (talk) 06:43, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- Pedestal101$ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Evidently a vandalism-only account. Repeated removal of information on Rickie Fowler, brand-new account. Sycerion (talk) 06:43, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-52412-11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Pan Am (1998–2004): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Childish vandal. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:47, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- Coolguy123456789ohmygodjustletmemakeanaccount (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Aktierisgustavsdominikszirneklispurgailis (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Justathrowaway26 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Enter yuour usernamee (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TheManWithNoUsernam3 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Used 3 instead of e attempting to skip filter: user ?name|policy|blacklist. Violating string: themanwithnousername" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:10, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 05:10, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
Current requests for increase in protection level
Reason: This page has been subject to disruption multiple times today. It was briefly hijacked, and two subsequent edits by another user have had to be suppressed.
Would semi-protection (or any edit protection at all) be appropriate for this page? – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 16:57, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I can't see where this was happening ... there are no reverts. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: The disruption took place on 2 October; the oversighted edits are the ones at 16:33 and 16:39. I do agree there is not enough disruption to require protection though. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:28, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- Really, the history makes a stronger case for blocking the disruptive editor. Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: The disruption took place on 2 October; the oversighted edits are the ones at 16:33 and 16:39. I do agree there is not enough disruption to require protection though. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:28, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism: Vandalism returned immediately after protection expired MathMan4 (talk) 02:40, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of vandalism renewed by temporary accounts on 3 October. Geoff | Who, me? 02:49, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Almost every change over the past few months (aside from reverts and removing protection notice) has been disruptive, even before a semi-protection of one year ended. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:00, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Penn65 (talk|cont) 03:10, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: ~2026-43913-45 (talk · contribs) blocked by Yue. The Bushranger One ping only 04:26, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: A recent EC protection expired earlier and Protection Helper Bot seems to be vacation because the long-standing indefnite semi-protection from 2013 hasn't been restored yet. Giovanni Potage (talk) 05:11, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- Seems to be an issue where the bot sometimes doesn't restore the protection right after the higher-level protection expires. The Vietnam War article was briefly unprotected in March 2025 following a three-month extended confirmed protection, though the bot did restore the previous indefinite semi-protection almost seven hours after the extended confirmed protection expired. BriDash9000 (talk) 06:35, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism Xvmn110 (talk) 05:25, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism Tender980 (talk) 05:40, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- There are two edits to that page (a redirect), neither of which are vandalism. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:46, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring by refspamming temporary account Malparti (talk) 06:43, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Requesting reduction in protection to pending changes, page was inf semi-protected over 3 years ago. The page also desperately needs updates and allowing more people to submit edits may help solve this. Szxq (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Ferret: Szxq (talk) 05:25, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
- I'd say no, but I'd leave it up to Ferret. Anyone can still make an edit request. The article consistently averages 1000 page views per day for all of 2026 so far. And it appears to be actively edited. The page history includes a high proportion of reverted edits prior to protection, and pending-change protection would not change that situation if the same activity resumes, edits would still need reversion, so such protection would simply become a burden on the community as if it was unprotected. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 05:52, 3 October 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Change “Collapse of the June ceasefire (July)” to “Collapse of the June ceasefire (20 June - 31 July)” because the June ceasefire ended on 19 June, not 30 June. ~2026-47054-03 (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
- Is a source for this already in the article? Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
OpenAI has decided to pause its training on all versions ~2026-50272-23 (talk) 15:48, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Look out it's Jimothy! 16:36, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- --~2026-50272-23 (talk) 18:07, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 15 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:30, 3 October 2026 (UTC) |
| 26 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:50, 4 October 2026 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Considering my extensive work and experience as a content contributor, including 28 good articles, 13 DYKs, two featured articles, two triple crowns, and many other articles created or greatly expanded, as well as experience reviewing GA and FA nominees. Another user recently commented here that they think I should be autopatrolled. Bneu2013 (talk) 03:39, 30 September 2026 (UTC) Bneu2013 (talk) 03:39, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I plan to replace archive.today or other deprecated archives with web.archive.org, for which AWB would be more than useful. 🐠 formerly U.T. 08:34, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
Want to start with typo-fixing to get a feel for AWB, then do other things like creating talk pages and such :3 pattersonuwu njz (talk) 19:26, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting AWB/JWB access to assist with repetitive maintenance edits such as fixing wikilinks, formatting, and other routine cleanup. I understand that I am responsible for reviewing every edit and following the AWB guidelines. I am still building my editing experience and would like to use JWB carefully for appropriate repetitive tasks. YusHau (talk) 21:05, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
I plan to semi-automate some typo fixes that I have already been making manually. I have completed several hundred of these edits, mainly removing incorrect spaces between the last word and the following punctuation mark. I would like to request AWB/JWB access, as these tools would be very useful for handling this type of repetitive maintenance work more efficiently. My intended workflow is to identify the relevant cases, apply the correction, review the result, and save the edit. I understand that I remain responsible for reviewing every edit and for following the AWB/JWB guidelines. I am still building my editing experience and intend to use JWB carefully and only for appropriate repetitive maintenance tasks. Score Beethoven (talk) 09:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to fix typos, add navboxes, and do other basic tasks. Thanks! Helpful Cat🐈 09:37, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
ConfirmedAlohaFromHawaii11 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) Can I have confirmed rights? This is a legitimate alternate account. I would like confirmed becuase my normal account Bennett Li11, does not have the new editor dashboard and I would like to have the same “new editor dashboard” on this alternate accounts. Cheers, AlohaFromHawaii11 (talk) 01:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
I am requesting the restoration of my Extended Confirmed rights. My previous request from September 6th wasn't approved by voorts based on generic claims ("This request seems LLM-generated to me" and "There are several AI tells in your request"), but when I explicitly asked what those tells were, no explanation or text examples were provided. I need to state clearly again: I do not use AI. English is not my native language, and my use of dictionaries and Google Translate to verify phrasing is what triggers false positives on automated detectors. This is not the first time this has happened to me, and I face a lot of unfair suspicion on Wikipedia as a result. Ignoring a non-native speaker's explanation and leaving generic AI accusations unexplained does not align with community values. A major reason I need this permission is to access the Content Translation tool. I have manually translated and created over 30 articles on this wiki, and not having this tool limits my ability to contribute. I have carefully reviewed past administrator feedback regarding extended confirmed requirements after a revocation and implemented them before submitting this request. Following the expected standard, I have focused strictly on manual, constructive work in the mainspace. Since losing the permission (at around 560 edits), I have made over 570 additional manual, documented, and productive edits in the mainspace, bringing my current total to over 1,130 edits. My recent notable contributions include researching and creating Non ædificandi from scratch and expanding Impasse Florimont, which was manually cleaned up, reviewed, and upgraded to B-Class status. I am NOT using LLMs. I am a REAL human editor who wishes to continue contributing to the English Wikipedia, and I am asking to please restore my Extended Confirmed rights. Thank you. The Regulator 1 (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I’m AlohaFromHawaii11, but my main account, Bennett Li11 has ECP rights and I would like to request ECP with this alt because my main does not have the new editor dashboard while this one does. Can you manually grant this permission? Pls reply to Bennett Li11. Cheers, AlohaFromHawaii11 (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights i want to fix up some stuff on upscrolled page i dont have the time to get ECP so i want to get it early i perfer to do stuff on my own. i do not like having to ask people to do it for me. MetroY2K (talk) 12:51, 2 October 2026 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator
I am requesting event coordinator rights to organise and manage on-wiki events using the Event Registration tool. I am conducting different wikipedia workshops for teachers and students. I document these programmes on Meta-Wiki. I also coordinate editing activities that need participant registration and tracking. Akbarali (talk) 18:01, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I have now done quite a lot on AFC and reviewed quite a few articles, showing that I understand content policies. Furthermore, if you look at my interactions, you can see that I have always acted civilly and resolved any disputes. From my Counter Vandalism Work, you can see that I always inform a user when I revert their edit; the same happens with AFC (through the AFC helper). I would primarily like this role as a counter-vandalism tool so that I can remove pages that are obviously vandalism, as I think that this is an important thing to do. I would also review other pages in order to help ease the backlog. I would finally like to thank anyone who reviews this request. Cheers,
hi, I would like to renew my NPP rights witch are about to expire. Different articles were reviewed over the last month, often after I added additional refs, images, or added/rephrased some text. After my adjustments, a few articles also got reviewed... by others :o) _regards Haggis MacHaggis (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
My NPP perm expired, and I would like to renew it. As an aside: I just noticed that I don't have a Draftify log properly set up, so I'll fix that. While I had temporary NPP rights, I draftified one article (see: ). Another editor helpfully demonstrated that the old page needs to be deleted after draftifying (per WP:CSD#R2), which I'll do myself next time. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 01:05, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
I have granted this right for three times for short time. 1, 2 and 3
I had been granted NPP in the past so that I may serve in the September 2026 Backlog Drive. I am re-requesting NPP permissions so that I may continue working on the NPP queue. I quite enjoyed my time working on the backlog drive, and got a good number of reviews done. I am also currently an AfC reviewer, and have worked on a large number of articles within the AfC queue. Thanks in advance :) 「Norellia.sh」(talk) 18:16, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
Good day. My name is Critical Hippo. I have contributed over 400 edits. I believe I have gained sufficient experience to patrol articles. The exemplar article I'd like to submit in consideration of my request is TV Edwards. I believe this article demonstrates the high quality contributions I have made to the platform. I would like to extend my contributions to the platform through reviewing and supporting others to improve their contributions. Thank you for considering my request. Critical Hippo (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Hello! I have been wanting for a long time to be a pending changes reviewer. I do a lot of AfC work and some GAN work. I can tell if a edit is good or not. If there are any questions, feel free to ping me or something. Robloxguest3 (talk)
Hello I would like to have pending changes reviewer rights, I routinely edit on my account with 500 edits in the past 3 weeks. I also have never participated in vandalism and routinely make productive edits. I have read Policy On Vandalism, Policy On Copyright, and I understand that I must obtain a neutral point of view and the guideline on reviewing. I request these services to help me expand my reach and find new ways of editing and helping Wikipedia. My limited services right now mainly include linking articles and welcoming new users. Thank you for your time and generosity! EzYop (talk) 01:58, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I sometimes run into articles with pending changes while monitoring recent changes, and it could be helpful to be able to accept or decline them. I already have Rollback rights. Thanks. PeterCooperJr (talk) 02:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ivebeenhacked. I have about 16,900+ edits and am familiar with the Wikipedia policies highlighted in WP:PCCRITERIA. I edit almost everyday in Wikipedia by correctly reverting vandalism, disruptive edits, and am competent in correcting incorrect information in articles. I'm confident I can be a great reviewer. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:59, 30 September 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I would like to use huggle to revert vandalism in a quicker manner as i find wp:twinkle a bit too slow sometimes and would like too see if I would prefer huggle or other similar editing tools. Jabba550 | ✉ in solidarity 13:52, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I’ve been an RC patroller for better part of a year now. Rollback rights will help me counter vandalism more effectively, especially when I have to undo contributions of editors with a disruptive editing history, editors with single-purpose COI accounts, and editors who have been blocked. I’d also like to use the suite of tools that rollback rights come with including CVPI and Huggle. I will not use rollback rights to settle content disputes (I don’t get into many either way). I hope that my main space contributions so far, and my experience with the platform + RC patrol will attest to my intentions. Thanks! Baberoothless (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
I'd like rollback rights in order to make recent change patrolling easier with tools such as Interceptor. Celjski Grad (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
I am planning to use WP:Interceptor and I believe rollback would make reverting vandalism more efficient. I believe that I meet the recommended (edited) criteria listed above. Thank you for processing my request! 16dvnk (talk) 05:20, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Previously had this as a temporary right for fighting vandalism with Huggle. Had a bit of a wiki-break but keen to revisit this. Thanks! sksatsuma 14:19, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights Hi, I would like the rollbacker right to more efficiently fight vandalism. As it is required for many counter-vandalism tools such as Huggle. I have experience in Recent Changes patrol. I also have moderation experience elsewhere. Thank you, Strongshorts (talk) 13:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC) Strongshorts (talk) 13:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights So that AI Model articles can be as high quality as possible CharlieRidesRollerCoasters (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I would like rollback to handle obvious vandalism more efficiently. I enjoy monitoring for spam, unconstructive edits, and talking to/notifying newer editors . I have read WP:ROLLBACK and will not use the default rollback summary on good-faith or disputed edits. Thanks. DocLG (talk) 22:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
Hello again! My name is LuigiMcpe4549. I would like to request rollback rights. That is because I have done some good edits and revert some vandalism on Wikipedia. I think that it is useful in case of crazy vandalism. It's ok if my application is denied again like last time. Cheers! :) LuigiMcpe4549 (talk) 15:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to have rollback permissions so I can utilize tools like AntiVandal to help out with recent changes patrol. Justcgi (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
I do a good amount of vandalism reverting, which some of the vandals that I deal with are multiple different temporary accounts vandalising pages in short periods of time. It would be nice to know if they are using the same IP address, so that why I can appropriately report the vandals to AIV. I promise that I will not inappropriately use the tool. MathMan4 (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I have been editing here for 20 years with a clean record. Nowadays, I mostly work in anti-vandalism and anti-UPE. In line with that, I do a lot of work at SPI. I feel that this right would help make sure that my SPI and AIV filings are accurate before submitting them. I assure you that this right won't be used for any purpose that is contrary to the terms. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I'm experienced in reverting & reporting vandals, so I think having this right would allow me to investigate more edits done by the same vandal (or disruptive editor), or maybe reporting multiple TAs of the same person. Edit: Yes, I agree to use it accordingly with the foundation's guidelines, FYI. Jako96 (talk) 13:51, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
I have brought a number of sockpuppet investigations, and also been involved with some LTAs using a set of IP ranges. I think one of these has returned, but can't bring informed AIV or SPI cases as I cannot tell which of the socks this relates to. Likely to be useful in future SPI and LTA abuse at AfD too. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:53, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
I'm an established vandalism fighter patrolling recent changes and reporting temporary accounts to WP:AIV. I've been dealing with an incident of a user possibly using multiple temporary accounts to disrupt Wikipedia, so I would like to see the information of what IP addresses they have been using. Eyesnore talk💬 16:33, 3 October 2026 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}{{#if:{{{showtaiv|}}}|
{{!}} showtaiv {{=}} {{{showtaiv}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely sure of purpose at this time. | String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show temporary account IP viewer | showtaiv | Allows hiding the requests for temporary account IP viewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |