Talk:Xingzhongite
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Tyroxin in topic Status as approved mineral
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Status as approved mineral
[edit]As of early 2025, mindat now states, that this mineral is "NOT an approved mineral species". This objects to earlier states of its entry visible by waybackmachine snapshots, as well as listing on the 2021 list of IMA symbols and a mentioning in Strunz. Then again, its composition appears poorly defined and apparently no type specimen has been declared in the past. Can someone shed more light on this supposed minerals current standing in geology? --Tyroxin (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
