Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a29f62de2f90aea1

Jump to content

Talk:World War II/Infobox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Jjfun3695 in topic Commanders and leaders


Commanders and leaders

[edit]

I am just wondering why Neville Chamberlain (the war began during his premiership), Harry Truman (both VE and VJ day), and even the King (George VI) are not included. On the World War I page, King George V is listed as a leader of the Entente Powers. Was there a more uniting figure in the British Empire/Commonwealth than the King?  Preceding unsigned comment added by Omnisome (talkcontribs) 00:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

The King played no significant role in directing the Commonwealth war effort - he was a constitutional monarch. As I noted on my talk page, the other leaders you suggest would add clutter to the infobox for little gain given that they led their nations for only small parts of the war, with FDR and Churchill being the dominant UK and US war leaders. Nick-D (talk) 00:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Then the page for WW1 is very cluttered.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Omnisome (talkcontribs) 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'd agree with that. It's a much inferior article to the one on World War II, and the infobox is a mess. Nick-D (talk) 01:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

I disagree with Harry Truman, Atlee and Chamberlain not being included, we are in fact giving an inaccurate story if they are not included on the leaders list. They should be added. George VI, I understand he was just a figurehead Jjfun3695 (talk) 04:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Reply