Talk:Windows accelerator

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Microsoft (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft

Microsoft Windows (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows

Missing the mentioning of features like 2d primitive acceleration

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Videocards that offered 2d hardware acceleration were much more than just blitters. They also accelerated the drawing of pixels, lines, curves, rectangles, polygons, and all kinds of other “graphics primitives” that were possible in 2d. Especially the ones that were introduced in the 90th for Windows 3.x, Windows NT and Windows 95 could to much more than blitting areas and they were not 3d accelerator videocards. --37.209.89.37 (talk) 22:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Missing the mentioning of features like 2d primitive acceleration