Talk:Wikimedia Foundation

Readd layoffs and union busting

Hi @Jeremy1231233 you reverted my edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Foundation&diff=prev&oldid=1356368489 due to source issues. While I see the medium article is just by one random person AFAIK, I think the Wiki citations are valid. They are citations of the source matter, it is about Wikipedia and the discussion happing on Wikipedia forums after all. They are this a primary source. (Also, the article already has a lot of wiki citations so the argument "it's not a reliable" source does not count here.)

I could not find other news articles/outlets covering the topic for now, likely because it is quite new. rugk (talk) 09:56, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

I don't remember any of this? The only edit I've made to the Wikimedia Foundation article was adding something to a list. Jeremy1231233 (talk) 11:23, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

@Rugk: I am the person who reverted your three edits. I still stand by what I did, but after reading this post and absorbing its point, I feel that it does need less WP:ABOUTSELF. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 13:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Support wikilinking directly to the petition in question. It is very obviously relevant, and it is referenced in coverage by The Verge, etc. ~2026-30415-19 (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I still don't understand what's going on. Like I said, the only edit I have made to this article was adding something to a list. I don't understand why you're dragging me to this. Jeremy1231233 (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

You were obviously pinged by mistake. ~2026-30415-19 (talk) 04:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Yes sorry. But back to topic here is the verge source: https://www.theverge.com/report/939442/wikipedia-editors-protest-wikimedia-layoffs-strike

Anyway, it's now included in the article. rugk (talk) 22:43, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

AI-generated content

Wikimedia Foundation#Present department structure is definitely AI-generated; the bullet points in bold are a dead giveaway. Should we rewrite this entirely per WP:NEWLLM? 𝔰𝔥𝔞𝔡𝔢𝔰𝔱𝔞𝔯 ^{(𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔨)} -⃝⃤ (they/he) In solidarity. 10:00, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Agreed. I have cut it from the article as I believe even if it was written by a human editor, it does not provide significant value to the article. Gato1260 (talk) 09:36, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Pinging Jayen466, who added that list according to a WikiBlame search for the addition of the words "Present department structure". Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:46, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

@Whyiseverythingalreadyused Thanks. That was definitely not an AI edit. I followed the WMF staff and contractors page, as it was then, and the department headings it had at the time. Andreas JN466 11:45, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

My bad; sorry, @Jayen466! That was on me. Although I would like to point out that using boldface as you were is kind of against the Manual of Style, as boldface should only be used in pretty specific contexts; see MOS:BOLD. Cheers, 𝔰𝔥𝔞𝔡𝔢𝔰𝔱𝔞𝔯 ^{(𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔨)} -⃝⃤ (they/he) In solidarity. 23:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

@Shadestar474 You're quite right about the use of bold of course, but that got added later by User:Sj, who is also not an AI user. "It was a human error." Andreas JN466 04:50, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying! Cheers, 𝔰𝔥𝔞𝔡𝔢𝔰𝔱𝔞𝔯 ^{(𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔨)} -⃝⃤ (they/he) In solidarity. 07:44, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Edit request 12 June 2026

−

* [[Wikinews]] – [[online newspaper]]; has been closed in 2026

+

* [[Wikinews]] – [[online newspaper]]; has been closed since 2026

~2026-32426-72 (talk) 09:40, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Partly done: changed to "closed in 2026" instead of "has been closed since 2026". Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:47, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 September 2026

Please change "It is structured as a charitable institution. Plus, it also functions independently of advertising and paywalls, relying on millions of individual donations." to "It is structured as a charitable institution. It also functions independently of advertising and paywalls, relying on millions of individual donations." to preserve a neutral point of view. ConsoleCoder (talk) 17:12, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

 Done I just removed those sentences, as that information is already in the first and third paragraphs. Thanks! ;; Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 17:59, 2 September 2026 (UTC)