This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
At 18:11, 12 July 2017, logged-out user at Special:Contributions/2605:A601:5D9:FB00:E56B:7672:BB0B:DE73 made changes to two pages - this page, and the page of the Baroness CEO of the AI company who's technology is pushed by WeProtect. The article reads like a press release or puff piece for WeProtect, with most citations referring to government statements of government events, which don't appear reputable for the kind of statements they're appearing to cite. The language is also commercial, as if the article is advertising WeProtect as "protect[ing] children from sexual abuse online". I am of the opinion the article has been manipulated by a malicious actor to shore up the reputation of WeProtect and is not WP:NPOV.
Note: Interestingly, the only reason I came to look is that they've just been exposed as running front groups intent on subverting encryption using AI "scanning", demonstrating malice. I'm not convinced these are the only two manipulated pages relevant to this organisation. 82.3.251.137 (talk) 11:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
