Talk:Warship
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by The Proccy in topic The "Types" section is very messy and difficult to read.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Warship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
The "Types" section is very messy and difficult to read.
[edit]The "Types" section of the document is difficult to read.
Would it be better as tables under subheadings? either as in the existing format of alphabetical order, or by adding additional headings devising them by era or some other metric?
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Technology
- C-Class vital articles in Technology
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- C-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages