Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2976ca62e33f8ab

Jump to content

Talk:Waahine Toa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Chocmilk03 in topic Pictures?

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:40, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that the Waahine Toa paintings by Robyn Kahukiwa were criticised as unfashionable when first exhibited in the 1980s, but are now considered iconic in New Zealand art?
  • Source: "The narrative aspect of the paintings and their combination of realism, stylisation and decorative patterning were out of key with the abstract tendencies of recent New Zealand painting and were not well received at the time. In due course, however, the series established Kahukiwa’s reputation as a major force in contemporary Maori art and indigenous politics and, internationally, as a significant artist ‘of colour’ in the women’s art movement." . Also the paintings "have registered themselves in the public consciousness" and have become "icons" in New Zealand's national art canon, per Mane-Wheoki, Jonathan (2005). "He Wahine Toa: Robyn Kahukiwa, Artist". The Art of Robyn Kahukiwa. Auckland: Reed Publishing (NZ) Ltd. pp. 30–31.
Created by Chocmilk03 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 30 past nominations.

Chocmilk03 (talk) 22:06, 30 March 2026 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.
    Overall: New article, long enough, no glaring policy issues, QPQ done. Main hook is stronger IMHO. Not a huge fan of the "missing" phrasing in ALT1 given that they were presumed to be owned by private collectors, which the article itself does a better job of presenting. But it's at least consistent with how The Post treats it. hinnk (talk) 01:25, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

    Pictures?

    [edit]

    seems that any article describing visual art should include pictures of such art ManlyMatt (talk) 03:50, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

    @ManlyMatt: Yeah, I was slightly nervous about adding one just since articles about paintings are not my wheelhouse and obviously all the paintings in the series are subject to copyright protections. I've now added an image of Hinetitama which complies with the non-free content policy. Thanks, Chocmilk03 (talk) 08:52, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply