Talk:Viola rafinesquei
Add topicLatest comment: 8 months ago by Jorge Stolfi in topic Please, NOT the Voynich Manuscript
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education assignment: Bio320_Plant Adaptations
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2025 and 16 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cactusking27 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Cactusking27 (talk) 04:01, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Please, NOT the Voynich Manuscript
[edit]The following sentences were removed since the identification of V. rafinesquei on the Voynich Manuscript is just an improbable guess:
Drawing of a flower determined to be Viola bicolor in the 15th-century Voynich Manuscript.
The Voynich Codex, also known as the Voynich manuscript, contains information that has been used to identify plants.[1] This 15th-century book contains an accurate drawing of Viola rafinesquii, with blue and white flowers, distinguishing it from Viola tricolor.[1] The presence of this drawing suggests that Viola rafinesquii had medicinal uses for native populations in the early 15th century.[1]
.jpg)