Talk:Vermont Route 44

Vermont Route 44 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 23, 2018. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / Vermont Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Types
	U.S. state highway
	Locations
	Vermont
	Article recognition
	This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in August 2018.
	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in October 2011.
	Notes and alerts
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

United States: Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Latest comment: 8 years ago11 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vermont Route 44/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 21:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll give this one a look over. Courcelles (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Can we find a way to rephrase "The state resurfaced VT 44 with more modern surfaces" to avoid "surface" twice in six words?
- I removed the latter part and replaced "resurfaced" with "paved." Most of the road was treated gravel until the work in the 70s and 80s. V C 00:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Does "Bennett's 1815 House" have a n article? Or are we just indirectly shilling for them here, just a little? Either way, we need a source for it.
- I mentioned it because there was an image of it in the article. However, I only found one newspaper article about it, and the article does not even mention where it is located. So I removed the mention and the image. V C 00:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Ref 1 should be split into three, with explicit notes as to which PDF is being used at any particular time.
- Can you point out where the GA criteria require pointing to the specific document referenced for a specific piece of information? V C 00:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
"Don't need to cap "Interstate" when written out, do we?
- Yes, we need to cap Interstate for two reasons: it is part of the name of the route, and Interstate refers to the Interstate Highway System. It would be lowercase if we were referring generically to routes that go through more than one state. V C 00:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
I might be very bad at chart reading, but how does the source prove that this was "in exchange for the town of Windsor taking over maintenance on the part of VT 44 east of VT 44A." I'm just not seeing the "in exchange" part demonstrated.
- I removed the causation from that sentence. V C 00:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Looks like a bridge was replaced for a couple million bucks recently, see Are there other sources and maintenance work that needs covering?
- The bridge in question is not notable, so its replacing does not need to be mentioned. V C 00:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Courcelles (talk) 21:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your review, Courcelles. V C 00:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

You're right, of course. Promoting. Courcelles (talk) 02:03, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

GA Review