Talk:Ursa Major
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ursa Major article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Delaware Diamond was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 24 July 2014 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
Photograph for article
[edit]
I tried to integrate this photograph into the article but it caused trouble with the text around the ursamajor-guide image. I hope someone in the future can find a way to integrate this into the article with out it causing damage to the article. Triddle 23:46, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, nice photo. How's it look now? I put it in the notes field of the infobox. If it could be cropped on the right, it would make the fainter stars look better. -Wikibob | Talk 00:18, 2005 Apr 1 (UTC)
- Nice! Thanks =) I cropped the photo to just Ursa Major now and it sure looks better. Triddle 04:16, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Pronunciation
[edit]Is the given IPA pronunciation British? I ask because it doesn't have any R sound in it.
- I had assumed that it would be Oor-sah My-or. If you're going to speak Latin, well, speak Latin! WHPratt (talk) 16:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Mythology - Javanese
[edit]Mythology section, listing Javanese name as Bintang Kartika, further mentions Sanskrit origin krittika कृत्तीका. Can someone verify this. In Indian astronomy, Saptarshi (Ursa Major) and Krittika Kṛttikā (Pleiades) are two different constellations.
Reference to Gibbon
[edit]Gibbon says "the possibility of the bear as Ursa Major having originated independently is inconceivable", while the main text of the article suggests pretty much the opposite... 67.49.102.35 (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Proposed image addition: NOIRLab annotated image of Ursa Major
[edit]
| This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Hello, I am affiliated with NSF NOIRLab and would like to propose an additive change to the "Asterisms" subsection under "Features". This is an additive proposal — the existing naked-eye photograph (File:UrsaMajorCC.jpg) would remain untouched in its current position. I am proposing to add a second, complementary image (an annotated wide-field astrophotograph showing the IAU boundaries, stick figure, and labeled stars) directly above it, so that readers have both a naked-eye view and an identification reference side by side in the same section. Proposed change: Add an annotated wide-field image of Ursa Major to the "Asterisms" subsection, placed immediately above the existing File:UrsaMajorCC.jpg. Image: File:Ursa Major (Annotated) (ursa-major-ann).tiff Suggested caption: The constellation Ursa Major showing the IAU boundaries, the constellation stick figure, and labels for its brightest stars. Astrophotograph by Eckhard Slawik, from NOIRLab's 88 Constellations project. Layout: Layout A — both images retained in the same section. The article is long and the "Asterisms" subsection has enough surrounding prose to support an additional thumbnail without visually overwhelming the text. The two images serve complementary purposes: the annotated chart aids star identification, while the existing naked-eye photograph conveys the unaided visual impression. License: CC BY 4.0 (NOIRLab/NSF/AURA), Eckhard Slawik Here is the exact wikitext to insert. It would go immediately before the existing Image:UrsaMajorCC.jpg ... line in the "Asterisms" subsection:

If any reviewer has concerns about this proposal, I am happy to (1) adjust the caption wording to better match the article's style, (2) replace the inline external link in the caption with a <ref> citation if references are preferred over caption links, or (3) withdraw the proposal entirely if the community prefers the article as it currently stands. I welcome feedback and will defer to uninvolved editors on the final form. Thank you for reviewing. Marcodatadev (talk) 01:02, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class Astronomy articles
- Top-importance Astronomy articles
- C-Class Astronomy articles of Top-importance
- C-Class Constellations articles
- Implemented requested edits
- Articles with connected contributors
