Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a289dd89bf50a5f3

Jump to content

Talk:Transperth A-series train

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 days ago by Aidennbaker in topic Set 38 withdrawal

Merge

[edit]

I have merged the two generations of A-series train as per the discussions on Talk:Transperth Second Generation A-series train. David Arthur 18:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

This was a full-content paste merger conducted as per WP:MERGE, with acknowledgement of the content copied from Transperth Second Generation A-series train for GFDL purposes, not a cut-and-paste move; the move was conducted using the standard move tool. David Arthur 19:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cite error

[edit]

Would someone please fix the cite error on this page? I have tried but nothing I do seems to help.--Klltr (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Contradiction in In service section

[edit]

In the "In service" section, it states that the Yanchep line was serviced by A-series trains until late-2016, but in the succeeding sentences it says they still operate on the Joondalup line, which is seemingly contradictory as the Joondalup line was renamed to the Yanchep line in 2024. Some rewording for clarity may be needed here. Neonalig (talk) 08:31, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Set 38 withdrawal

[edit]

We are NOT causing any confusion by making people think that it is still in service because it is not. Aidennbaker (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

So we need a reliable source that mentions the train has been withdrawn for us to say it on Wikipedia. Steelkamp (talk) 16:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Didn't Lachlan do that? Aidennbaker (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
A Facebook post isn't a reliable source and that post didn't fully verify the claims made. Fork99 (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I've learned to be wary of unsourced claims that gunzels make. I've seen them previously claim that after this incident where an A-series train ran into an unwired section and the pantograph was damage, that the train would be withdrawn. That train was repaired and is now back up and running. Steelkamp (talk) 02:10, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Haha that reminds me, I can't remember on which article, might have been from the eastern states, someone claimed a particular train had blown up in some explosion and cited a Facebook post. Probably an April Fools post/some sort of hoax, I don't remember. If a train blew up, I'd imagine there'd be a lot more news coverage than from some train enthusiasts. Fork99 (talk) 02:21, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I will get set 38 retired sticker photo and do it myself. It clearly has a sticker saying it's retired. Aidennbaker (talk) 04:19, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
This would be original research, which is also not allowed on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, even if you know something to be true, it has to be written about in reliable sources to be reported on Wikipedia. Fork99 (talk) 04:27, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Please go to Claisebrook depot and take the photo if you really want to see for yourself Aidennbaker (talk) 07:38, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
It's on the non-damaged carriage at the front Aidennbaker (talk) 07:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Still original research. PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 08:48, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I WILL make sure it ain't Aidennbaker (talk) 12:11, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply