This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The blog link this user (who also appears to be User:72.64.43.135 and User:76.79.192.208) oontinues to insert in the articles clearly violates WP:BLP and WP:ELNO. It is especially pernicious in that the URL and reference are designed to appear to the casual reader to be the subject's own blog, not an attack blog aimed at him.
This user did finally provide a reliable source for one point (the judgeships). I tried to make the language of that section more neutral but he reverted that, inserting a statement that directly contradicts the source. He has also made a point of citing the attack blog as a "source". Rklear (talk) 06:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your efforts. I have tweaked the language again to make it consistent with the sources and to address some of the BLP concerns. The attack blog is not a reliable source, and, based on various policies (notably WP:BLP), may not be used as a reference or external link. WP:BLP is non-negotiable and continued insistance on using the blog will result in the protection of this article from editing.--Kubigula(talk)16:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply