Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a6f8f0ccf5b7b5

Jump to content

Talk:The Secret of Us

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AI

[edit]

Hi -- I have tagged this article as containing AI-generated text. This is the edit in question (note also this user has created another AI generated Gracie Abrams article around this time). As usual with AI, it is a thicket of AI slop attributed to sources that do not say that. (Some of the more egregious stuff has been removed.) Problems found in a spot check:

  • According to Elise Ryan from the Associated Press, the album's lead single "Risk" ... setting the tone for the album's exploration of love and emotional risk - The review does not say the song sets the tone for anything, nor does it say that the album explores love or emotional depth.
  • noting that tracks like "Normal Thing" and "Close to You" feature subdued synths and percolating beats, hinting at dancefloor euphoria without fully committing to it - "Percolating beats," "subdued synths," and "hinting at dancefloor euphoria" are all close paraphrasing of the review that borders on outright plagiarism.
  • Abrams' songwriting on The Secret of Us delves into real-time narratives of relationships and personal growth, contrasting with the retrospective nature of her previous work. Unsourced AI slop and also nonsensical (all albums are retrospective unless they are being literally recorded as events happen).
  • Songs like "Blowing Smoke" and "Let It Happen" showcase her transition from introspective ballads to more dynamic and energetic compositions. -- More unsourced AI slop.
  • This collaboration is seen as a pivotal moment on the album, enhancing its emotional depth and broad appeal -- ...

I tapped out here. Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:29, 12 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

edit - The "retrospective" thing seems to be a reference to something the AP review says, though it is not sourced to it. So it's not the AI that said something nonsensical here but the critic; the AI just put it in wikivoice. Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:33, 12 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

That's So True should not be listed as a single in the infobox

[edit]

Hi MFTP Dan, I'm starting a discussion here as I would prefer not to edit war. I'm reverting to the status quo one final time, but would prefer to continue the discussion on the talk page. Template:Infobox_album#Template:Singles is quite unambiguous in its wording (Do not include singles that were added as bonus tracks on a re-release of an album.) This album and That's So True aren't at all exceptions, and adding it is inappropriate. It doesn't matter if you interpret it to be allowed by inserting a separate section; the only way it would be acceptable is if the deluxe version has its own article (like Eternal Sunshine Deluxe: Brighter Days Ahead having Twilight Zone as a single.) If you think the policy should be changed, please bring it up on the template talk page instead of violating Wikipedia policy to assert your own interpretation. I like octopusestalk to me, talk to me 17:20, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

It absolutely ought to be listed and these are the type of debates I love to have! It already exists in many articles and I think it actually is a benefit, and the documentation ought to be changed. I'll take your invitation. mftp dan oops 17:53, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply