Talk:The Chronology of Water
Add topicLatest comment: 8 months ago by Erik in topic Shouldn't this be labeled (Film) relative to the (Book)?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Poster released
[edit]Shouldn't this be labeled (Film) relative to the (Book)?
[edit]I just saw the film. Fascinating. However, links for "The Chronology of Water" trace to this page which is the film. Initial credit and reference should direct to the book since it is what the film is based on. Enderwilson (talk) 19:22, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- It looks like the film article was created before the book article, and I assume that's why the setup is the way it is now. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC would need to be applied to argue that the book article should be the primary topic instead of the film article (if that is what you are arguing for). It's not unprecedented, though, for the film adaptation to have more views than the source material, like with Fight Club. If you want, you can start a WP:RM discussion proposing the article moves and why. For what it's worth, this shows the current page views (with film being higher since it just came out this year). Erik (talk | contrib) 19:35, 5 November 2025 (UTC)