Talk:The Aboriginal Mother

A fact from The Aboriginal Mother appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 February 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the poem "The Aboriginal Mother" expresses grief about the massacre of at least 28 Aboriginal Australians at a time when a white settler said, "Why, we are poisoning the Blacks; which is much safer; and serve them right too!"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2019/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Aboriginal Mother.

Wikipedia

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Literature Low‑importance

	Australia portal The Aboriginal Mother is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

date contradiction

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The poem's second appearance … on 27 October 1841. Afterwards, it appeared … including The Australasian Chronicle (16 October 1841).

Nice article, although something is awry with the sequence. cygnis insignis 18:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I also corrected some punctuation to logical quotation, so called, and think the MOS supports that. Revert it that was already considered. cygnis insignis 18:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the corrections, Cygnis insignis; the edits you made were quite helpful to the article imo so I personally certainly don't have a problem with any of them. As for the date contradiction, I believe I've fixed it now; I just omitted the word second for that part and moved it to the rest of the list of publications the poem appeared in. It looks like the source specified that there were two very slightly different versions of the poem and listed the publications of the second version after the first, which may have been what confused me and caused the contradiction. Thanks for catching that and letting me know!--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 21:32, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Cool. I would be tempted to abbreviate the reprinting to periods, the contemporary and the current with one or two appearances in between. The anthologies titles add some authoritative weight to it's importance in literature, but it becomes a little sea of italic for the reader and I would footnote the titles. That is just my take, merely an incidental comment in passing. cygnis insignis 03:57, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

date contradiction