Talk:Text segmentation

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Writing systems High‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I added material. Is it OK to remove the "stub" labels?

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I work with NLP (text segmentation, parsing, information extraction). I provided what I think is a good overview for text sementation (while keeping it concise).

Is it OK to remove the stub labels?

-Mark Watson

As soon as you think it no longer meets the description at WP:STUB ("A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text which is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, but not so short as to provide no useful information. Sizable articles are usually not considered stubs, even if they lack wikification or copy editing.") please remove stub markings. This article is well beyond a few sentences, so I've removed them. Thayvian (talk) 07:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

I added material. Is it OK to remove the "stub" labels?