Talk:Tendinopathy
Add topic | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Tendinopathy.
|
Tendinosis
[edit]Should tendinosis not have its own article or section at least? This article has a nice explanation, but I do not feel comfortable to write about this as I do not have a medical background: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312643/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfgang-gerlach (talk • contribs) 14:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Tendinosis should absolutely have its own article or section— it's a non inflammatory type of tendinopathy, and currently the tendinopathy page is misleading with saying it's an inflammatory condition. Tendinopathy is a collective term for several tendon dysfunction issues, including both tendinitis (inflammatory) and tendinosis (degenerative) 69.193.65.29 (talk) 03:15, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
spelling
[edit]Both i and o are correct, but could we agree on one of them? --92.208.247.86 (talk) 11:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Nutraceuticals
[edit]This recently added section looks like a promotion, tagged. Best 78.15.161.228 (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Let's get the numbers right
[edit]The second paragraph of this article starts, "Three terms have evolved in the medical terminology to refer to injuries that cause tendon pain:" and it then goes on to list five terms as bullet points.
Perhaps there is a historical reason why this has happened - maybe an editor accumulating the two later terms into the bullets from following text. So perhaps they deserve a different bullet list with their own introductory clause. But whatever the reason or however it might better be expressed, it doesn't read well at the current time.
Since I am not any kind of subject expert, it would probably be better for an editor who is more knowledgeable to perform the necessary textual surgery. Hedles (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Prefered term
[edit]This is the preferred term per MeSH with the other two being technically slight narrower but often used synonymously. https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?ui=D052256 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Number of alternative names in the first sentence
[edit]Generally we just pick two and put the rest in the infobox. There are lots. I do not care which two. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)