Talk:Technophobia/GA2
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Gary King in topic GA Review
GA Review
[edit]Hi, it's me again. This article did not address the points I raised in the last review, so I will re-iterate some of the points below:
- Format references according to WP:CITE/ES. They must include the publisher and access date; this includes footnotes. I suggest using {{cite web}} to do this. The references that are not used inline are not really useful because they do not show which information they are referencing.
- Expand the lead per WP:LEAD. The lead section should be a summary of the entire article rather than simply an introduction; right now, it is far too short.
Please address these issues and respond here to update me on its progress. Gary King (talk) 16:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- A useful tool that eases the use of citation templates: . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Because there has been no response in seven days, this article has failed its Good article nomination. Gary King (talk) 04:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)