Talk:Tandragee Idol
Add topic| Tandragee Idol was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 20, 2026, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tandragee Idol/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Ceoil (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Joko2468 (talk · contribs) 19:46, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
General comments
[edit]Taking this up. Great job with this article, it's well written and, though I'm not too familiar with these types of articles, appears comprehensive. The description of the fellow in the lede made me chuckle, I thought it was a bit harsh.
A cast is in the Ulster Museum, Belfast.
needs a citationCathedral Hill (also known as...
There's no end to this bracket, it could be replaced with a comma- Mark Williams is an Associate Professor of Global Medieval Literature-- is he qualified to be dating the idol? This seems to be the WP:FRINGE position of a non-expert, but then what expertise would help one date a stone carving?
- ref 15 isn't a reference and there's no source cited.
Randomised spot check of citations
[edit]29, 17, 6, 22, 14
- 29: I'm not seeing anything about a double-headed figure from Boa Island, please tell me if I'm being dense. It appears to instead compare the idol to a figure carved into a boulder from Rathmullan, County Donegal. ref 28 (the BBC source) doesn't appear to be relevant to this material and it dates the idol beyond what is presented as the scholarly consensus, calling into question its reliability as a source.
- 6: doesn't seem to describe the idol as squat or without a neck
- 14: Could you provide the quotation supporting this?
- ref 18 doesn't support that the idol is from 1st century BC, it just says Iron Age. The same is true of ref 17.
- The second instance of ref 8 doesn't appear to mention it as a shrine
Apologies but the verification failures here have led me to quick fail the nomination. If I have been inordinately dense or you think I've made a mistake (this is my first time failing a review so it's possible that I've been too harsh here) then please contact me on my talk page and I'll consider reopening the review. Thanks.