Talk:TWA Flight Center

Creating article

i added this information. it had been deleted from the JFK entry, which seems to have 10 million fingers on it and no one able to keep up with what is lost. Apologies for early lack of citations..i know more is needed but it is first step.BrandlandUSA 18:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

1969 photograph

Here is a fair-use photograph of the terminal in "happier times"... Enigma3542002 04:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

NRHP

I've rated the article as a "C" class article for the NRHP project. It's much improved, but perhaps leans too heavily on recent developments and could use discussion of its reception when built and influences on others. Acroterion _(talk) 02:21, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes... much harder to come by info on the original building... but will do.842U (talk) 13:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 11:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

TWA Flight Center

• ... that Eero Saarinen intended his TWA Flight Center (pictured) to be practically useful as well as a symbol to "interpret the sensation of flying"? Source: Architectural Record: p. 129. July 1962.
  • ALT1:... that contractors spent 5,500 man-hours on drawings for the design of the TWA Flight Center (pictured)? Source: Architectural Forum. 113: p. 119. August 1960.
  • ALT2:... that during the 2000s, the TWA Flight Center (pictured) was used as a filming location, and later housed an art exhibition that closed after the building was vandalized? Source: NY Times 2003, NY Times 2004

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 15:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC).

• @Epicgenius: Passed GA recently enough, long enough, and no issue was found with regards to copyvio, neutrality, or referencing. ALT1 is probably too long, ALT1 and the top hook are present in the article but can't verify the top hook in the given source (p.129 seems to be about something else but maybe I missed something. QPQ done. ALT1 good to go. HaEr48 (talk) 01:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)