Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2892d036d18c20a

Jump to content

Talk:Sublingua/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by MathewTownsend in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:23, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

review
  • I've reviewed this article and made a few minor copy edits which you are free to change.
The changes look excellent. Thanks for the ce and typo fixes. – VisionHolder « talk » 00:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • I have just one question. Why under "Literature cited" do some of the citations have an "edit" link to edit the citation? (I've never seen this before.)
Those citations use the templates {{cite doi}} or {{cite pmid}}. The templates are useful for standardizing and simplifying references between articles, and since I may be using these same sources for articles like Toothcomb or an upcoming article like Anatomy of lemurs. – VisionHolder « talk » 00:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I still hope to provide better illustrations soon. But I figured this was good enough for GA. – VisionHolder « talk » 00:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
    B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Provides references to all sources:
    B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Main aspects are addressed:
    B. Remains focused:
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: