Talk:Squigonometry

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 23 September 2024 by reviewer Curb Safe Charmer (talk · contribs).

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Might be worth merging this to Generalized trigonometry and discussing in context

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I feel like a focus on "squigonometry" per se is an undue emphasis on Wood and Poodiack's work that takes it somewhat out of the context of a wider range of past effort. I'm not sure the concept as described here is really notable by Wikipedia standards; "squigonometry" is a neologism with limited adoption. We could probably do a better job by making it a specific section at Generalized trigonometry, and limiting to a fairly concise summary. –jacobolus (t) 23:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Might be worth merging this to Generalized trigonometry and discussing in context