Talk:Seigenthaler
Add topicLatest comment: 11 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 17 October 2025
 | This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 17 October 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Seigenthaler (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 17 October 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:09, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Seigenthaler → Seigenthaler (disambiguation) – I'm pretty sure Seigenthaler should be a redirect either to John Seigenthaler or the Seigenthaler biography incident, because either of these two seem to be the most notable. 112.208.79.200 (talk) 19:45, 17 October 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 20:05, 24 October 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Happy halloween, pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 21:27, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Move to Seigenthaler (surname) instead, if consensus decides that John Seigenthaler and the related controversy are more notable than the other two people listed on the page (one of them being his son). Speaking of the controversy, there is an RM going on there.Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 21:10, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Update: The RM over at the article about the controversy closed as not moved.Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 20:07, 24 October 2025 (UTC)- Switching to oppose per everyone below. Consensus is slowly deciding that John Seignthaler is not the primary topic in this case. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 00:43, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Anthroponymy has been notified of this discussion. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 20:05, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The entries are all only WP:PTMs, with none showing a large enough viewership to be considered a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Apparently a solution looking for a problem, as this Seigenthaler dab itself only average 1 view/day.—Bagumba (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose, no primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 21:41, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 00:19, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:16, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.