This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As Indiegen notes the piece is about a group with a significant body of work now with extensive media coverage. I developed this article long ago and it is still languishing in the draft stage. Random, insignificant bands from the US get a Wikipedia page with one or two references but it takes so long to get third-world articles to pass. Admins love deleting pages more than helping contribute to knowledge. Let a page live and people will start fixing it. The policies are fundamentally flawed. Popoblahblah (talk) 12:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Seedhe Maut has extensive coverage from multiple reliable sources, the submission needs to be re-reviewed and (in my opinion) accepted
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Seedhe Maut is quite a notable hip hop duo in India. Just dropping this comment in support of acceptance and publication of the submission of the draft article on them. The current draft cites articles (that are primarily about that) appearing in international media (Vice) and multiple Indian newspapers and media houses (New Indian Express, Firstpost, Mid-day, Rolling Stone India, Mixmag, The Tribune, etc.). I think it sufficiently demonstrates notability and significant coverage. If reviewers can provide more detailed comments, I am happy to edit the draft so that its publication is expedited. Indiegen (talk) 19:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Seems like the the article submission has been rejected again on 23 January 2023. This is quite said, and the basis of the rejection (notability) is absurd at face value. Vice, Firstpost, Mid-day have articles specifically about the hip hop duo. Their albums are being reviewed in top music publications. These are all in the sources. The rejection is not based on any sound argument, and does not offer any advice to the draft article authors/editors. Indiegen (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
