Talk:Secularization

Editorial matters

I have completed the Wikification and hope that I have made the content more accessible. I acknowledge that this topic, being so closely related to secularism, may be considered controversial and I therefore wait with interest to see whether the world thinks I have managed to maintain an appropriate level of neutrality. --David91 06:55, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Secularization theory and secularization hypothesis

I gather those are two alternative names for the phenomena discussed here? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

problematic sentence

The sentence that starts "'secular' has.." is problematic. Secular is an adjective, not a noun. Moreover it states that Christianity "had" secular clergy in the Middle Ages. "Secular clergy" just means clergy that are not members of religious orders. They have not gone away. See secular clergy. 2600:4040:7844:3A00:686B:977D:714D:DC4B (talk) 05:34, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Sentence with dated language

"For instance, even as native whites became more secular, London, England, has become more religious in the past 25 years as religious immigrants and their descendants have increased their share of the population"

I don't think native whites is an appropriate term to acknowldge the white British and implies a superiority 86.8.87.130 (talk) 15:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)