Talk:Salinella

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Animals Low‑importance

Salinella is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

History of Science Low‑importance

	This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Boutan, Louis (1897). Cours de zoologie (in French). Octave Doin. pp. 25–27.
Apáthy, Stefan (1892). "Critical observations on Frenzel's Mesozoon Salinella: a biological sketch". Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 6. 9 (54): 465–481. doi:10.1080/00222939208677361.
Blackwelder, R.E. (1963). Classification of the Animal Kingdom. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press. [original source for "Monoblastozoa"]
Furuya, Hidetaka (2004). 中生動物研究の現状 [Current Situation of Systematic Study on the Mesozoa]. Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology (in Japanese). 16: 1–8. doi:10.19004/taxa.16.0_1. ISSN 1342-2367. [discusses Mesozoa, mentions Salinella]
Dunning, Hayley (1 October 2012). "Gone Missing, circa 1892". The Scientist Magazine. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
Frenzel, J. (1892). "The Mesozoon Salinella". Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 6. 9 (49): 79–84. [English translation of "Das Mesozoon: Salinella"]

There is a draft for this page located at User:Chaotic Enby/Drafts/Salinella.

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is neither obsolete nor dubious, rather it's uncertain (whether it ever existed or still exists). I'll consider removing those categories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.169.98.40 (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dubious taxonomic term?

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the taxonomy box the term "Acrolophocyta" is used. This name has no Google hits expect this page itself and a few mirror sites. Is it a misspelling of an actual taxonomic term? I've gone ahead and removed it, but I'm making a note here in case anyone knows more. 2602:306:CCF2:EB39:E1B4:33D6:B1E2:72A2 (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Poor quality of article

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article needs to be revised by an experienced writer. It seems to have been written by someone with poor skills in writing. EGetzler (talk) 14:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wow thats harsh do it yourself then 46.253.188.16 (talk) 14:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

[Untitled]

Dubious taxonomic term?

Poor quality of article