Talk:Roger J. Hamilton
Add topic| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Promotional editing and COI concerns
[edit]Conflict-of-interest / promotional editing. Several accounts appear connected to the subject or his companies based on their usernames and editing patterns:
- Entrepreneurdynamics (talk · contribs) has a username matching the subject's "Wealth Dynamics" / "Talent Dynamics" brands and added a promotional image (June 2022).
- Jhatka4u (talk · contribs) is unusually focused on this page (2013 to 2018), and on 12 April 2018 removed an {{Advert}} template that had been placed by an experienced editor in 2017, while adding favorable material.
- Daniel Acutt (talk · contribs) added promotional career and "social entrepreneurship" content (February 2021).
These accounts have not declared a connection, which raises concerns under WP:COI and WP:PAID.
Promotional tone and sourcing. The article reads in places like marketing copy (peacock terms such as "Asia's leading wealth consultant," glowing one-line descriptions of each business venture) and leans heavily on the subject's own websites and company listings. It needs trimming to a neutral tone and better independent sourcing per WP:NPOV, WP:RS, and WP:PEACOCK.
BLP problems in the other direction. The page has also been a target for unsourced negative additions. Recent revisions contained unreferenced contentious claims (e.g. editorializing about stock and bitcoin losses, gibberish text). Per WP:BLP, such material should not be restored without a reliable source.
In short, this page needs serious rewrite based on the COI and other concerns outlined.