Talk:Ring learning with errors signature

Untitled

I worked on making sure the equations and text matched what is in the Singh and GLP papers. Jinbolin (talk) 02:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Not a statement of opinion

I am not the original author of this article but have made a number of additions and edits over the past year. I do not believe it reflects the opinions of the original author and should not be described as such. Much of the information about the prospects for quantum computing comes from the "opinions" of supposed experts in the field of quantum computing. The original author seems to have documented his or her sources for their material.

I recommend that the notification of this article as an opinion piece be removed. Jinbolin (talk) 18:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Not a Statement of Opinion

I agree with JINBOLIN. This article has references for all its assertions and does not reflect an opinion. Cryptocat (talk) 21:17, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Note for future.

According to a NIST 2015 paper, we've a formal name for this RLWE-SIG scheme, it's GLP.

As BLISS improves upon GLP, GLP may fall out of sight soon, and RLWE-SIG should become a general term for signature schemes based on the Ring Learning with Errors problem.

So remember to rename the page and reword the article someday.

Dannyniu (talk) 09:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC)