Talk:Rigid constitution
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Fabrickator in topic about Wikidata
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
about Wikidata
[edit]I am planning to edit wikidata, Entrenched clause are confused with this article. --AtagoKohun (talk) 14:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Ten years after! There are several articles which refer to "entrenched constitution" but no article or redirect with that term. We do have entrenchment clause, which redirects to entrenched clause, and the "warning" (right in this section of the talk page) that entrenched clause should be distinguished from rigid constitution.
- I suggest that these are really all variations on the same concept (i.e. a provision that demands an extraordinary process in order to make a change) and that these are best handled in a single article, e.g. Entrenchment provision, replacing the existing "entrenched clause" and "rigid constitution" articles. Looking for feedback. Fabrickator (talk) 21:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)