Talk:RenderX
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This page may need one of those "reads like an ad" warning boxes. It is borderline. Also, for any library with market competition, I like to see a link to a comparison chart, or at least a comparison or criticism section.
XEP was PROD tagged for "no indication of WP:notability. No independent WP:reliable sources." However, it is a product of RenderX, which appears to be a viable article about a notable company (and which already mentions the product in RenderX#Products). Therefore, could merge the product into that section and set a redirect. DMacks (talk) 06:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
- Merge lack of sources / notability (currently). Widefox; talk 12:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of RenderX
[edit]I have proposed the deletion of RenderX because it does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for its subject. Some issues were noted in 2016 and not addressed; as of 2025 the company does not appear to have a presence in professional organizations and its Palo Alto office address is a coworking space. The company does not show up in LinkedIn, though a 2024 AI firm with the same name does. Microsoft also offers an unrelated medical app with the RenderX name.
If reliable secondary sources can be provided, that may establish notability and the PROD can be removed.
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
