Talk:Religious attribution
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by Nicolecorn98 in topic Naturalistic attribution
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Religious attribution article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment at Central College that ended on 1 May 2012. Further details are available here. |
Naturalistic attribution
[edit]The section titled Naturalistic attribution, has only two sentences that are both run on. The section makes little sense in its present state. Grammatical clarification is needed.
- The Lead is also confusing and doesn't relate to the content of the article very much. It also contains a definition for "miracle" that isn't mentioned anywhere else. Emmalucia2 (talk) 22:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
It is also confusing what the difference is between naturalistic attributions and religious attributions. The sections need to include more detail and better definitions to help readers understand the topic. The overall organization was not bad, but the article itself was messy. More sources need to be added to each section rather than relying on one source per section.Nicolecorn98 (talk) 06:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)