Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a226b47ccce2c526

Jump to content

Talk:Recursive acronym

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 23 days ago by Tromars in topic BING seems to not be an example

What about India

[edit]

This one `Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance` or does that n mean it's not counted 2405:201:E004:A818:35E0:5E04:DF24:2DEF (talk) 18:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

cURL is not really a backronym

[edit]

According to the creator, cURL as a backronym was merely a suggestion: https://everything.curl.dev/project/name.html#:~:text=Later%20on%2C%20someone,were%20that%20clever%E2%80%A6 ~2026-25388-1 (talk) 20:07, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reasons listed for first letter recursion prevalence may be inaccurate

[edit]

As listed, the reasons for the prevalence of recursive acronyms being recursive on their first letter include humor, pronunciation, or consistency with pre-existing acronyms. However, it seems the most common reason should just be name availability. For an acronym to not be recursive on the first letter, the first letter must occur multiple times in the word, which restricts the acronyms that can be recursive at all. No such restriction, by definition, exists for first letter recursive acronyms. This also arguably makes the trend non-arbitrary.

If that context is meant to be implied by "consistency with an earlier acronym that used the same letters for different words" then this is not clear, and is made not helped by the examples of PHP and YOPY. Snikerop (talk) 01:52, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

BING seems to not be an example

[edit]

Bing is not google seems to have been created jokingly on Twitter by this PCMag article: https://www.pcmag.com/archive/why-microsoft-named-its-search-engine-bing-240686

Should it be removed from the list or should an explanatory note be added that the acronym was given unofficially? Toaast (talk) 22:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you, it should be removed. I even tried to remove it myself because i found the same pcmag article, before i saw your comment, but i didnt understand what's going on with that weird template. Tromars (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Additionally, I'd say remove the `failed verification` and the current citation from the WINE entry. The linked page only explains, that under a certain definition of the word "emulator" it can be thought of as one. This doesn't disprove that the name was based on "Wine is not an emulator". The official website for Wine even explicitly states, that this is the origin of the name. See https://www.winehq.org/about Tromars (talk) 18:39, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, I've made these changes to the article. Toaast (talk) 18:14, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Tromars (talk) 14:10, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply