Talk:Pure Cult

Fair use rationale for Image:Pure cult - for rockers ravers lovers and sinners a.jpg

Image:Pure cult - for rockers ravers lovers and sinners a.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Merge proposal

I propose merging Pure Cult: The Singles 1984–1995 into Pure Cult: for Rockers, Ravers, Lovers, and Sinners. Pure Cult: The Singles is essentially a reissue of Pure Cult: for Rockers, Ravers, Lovers, and Sinners and although it seems to meet the notability criteria, its content is better explained in the context of this article. Mika1h (talk) 19:25, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Mika1h, this has been open for over a month without objection, you should be good to carry out a WP:BOLDMERGE if this is something you're still interested in. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 20:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Requested move 1 January 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 23:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

---

Pure Cult: for Rockers, Ravers, Lovers, and Sinners → Pure Cult – Article is about an album that has 2 versions of roughly equal importance. They both share the title "Pure Cult" with different subtitles. I think it makes sense to title article just "Pure Cult". AllMusic and Rock Hard (magazine) refer to the first album as simply "Pure Cult": , . Rock Hard also refer to the reissue as just "Pure Cult" (at least in the title of the review, the whole review is paywalled): . Mika1h (talk) 23:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Support per nom, move is appropriate considering the merge above and could have been proposed along with it. BrechtBro (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.