Talk:Presstitute

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 September 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Wolfe/Watkins Situation

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I deleted, for the second time, a sentence that was not appropriate for this page. The subject of the sentence was a reporter named Ali Watkins. I suspect the user Lkshoe believes this situation tracks with the term. However, this is the page for the term "Presstitute." If the term is not used in the references, then it has not been "controversially used" as stated in the deleted sentence. Thus far, the user has failed to link to a reference that uses the term "presstitute." Just because a user thinks the term should apply, does not mean that it applies for purposes of an encyclopedic entry. Magic1million (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I reverted the same language by Lkshoe, this time supported by a highly-questionable news source. I would encourage Lkshoe to discuss the sentence here, so that we can have a conversation about its merits. As far as I can tell, the term has not been used by almost anyone to describe the Watkins/Wolfe situation. A Google News search of "presstitute 'Ali Watkins'" yields exactly one result from October 2017, which does not relate to this situation in any way. A regular Google search yields mostly non-notable Twitter commentary and the one non-WP:RS article credited to "Editor" on a highly-suspect news source. I am asking that users either state some further rationale for including reference to the Watkins-Wolfe situation, or stop placing the language into the page. Magic1million (talk) 00:45, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Wolfe/Watkins Situation