Talk:Polychoric correlation

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Could someone add some attempt to say what polychoric correlation is? That's not even remotely hinted at here. Michael Hardy 23:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

...and it's still not here. But the article in Basque, unlike this one, seems to say something specific, if far from complete. Can someone translate that? Michael Hardy (talk) 04:46, 23 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wouldn’t it make sense, too, to consider whether this technique is appropriate, and works, for ‪heteroskedastic data, and if it fits with a bayesian approach? Fustbariclation (talk) 19:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The page at John Uebersax's website seems to have been hijacked. It redirects to a page in Korean, talking about philosophy. (Arthur van der Harg) 15:15, 30 Jan 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. I've removed that link. Bondegezou (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.